Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31280289›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2020

Sex and regional differences in myocardial plasticity in aortic stenosis are revealed by 3D model machine learning.

Anish N Bhuva, Thomas A Treibel, Antonio De Marvao, Carlo Biffi, Timothy J W Dawes, Georgia Doumou, Wenjia Bai, Kush Patel, Redha Boubertakh, Daniel Rueckert and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02174471 (REgression in Left Ventricular Interstitial Expansion and Fibrosis After Aortic Stenosis Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02174471 completednot on this map

REgression in Left Ventricular Interstitial Expansion and Fibrosis After Aortic Stenosis Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2012 to 2016Enrolled181ConditionsAortic Stenosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Genotype-Phenotype Taxonomy of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Artificial Intelligence for Cardiac Imaging-Genetics Research.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anish N BhuvaInstitute for Cardiovascular Science, University College London, Chenies Mews, London WC1E6HX, UK.
Thomas A TreibelInstitute for Cardiovascular Science, University College London, Chenies Mews, London WC1E6HX, UK.
Antonio De MarvaoMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London W120NN, UK.
Carlo BiffiMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London W120NN, UK.
Timothy J W DawesMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London W120NN, UK.
Georgia DoumouMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London W120NN, UK.
Wenjia BaiDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, 180 Queen's Gate, London SW72RH, UK.
Kush PatelInstitute for Cardiovascular Science, University College London, Chenies Mews, London WC1E6HX, UK.
Redha BoubertakhDepartment of Cardiovascular Imaging, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, King George V Building, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.
Daniel RueckertDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, 180 Queen's Gate, London SW72RH, UK.
Declan P O'ReganMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London W120NN, UK.
Alun D HughesInstitute for Cardiovascular Science, University College London, Chenies Mews, London WC1E6HX, UK.
James C MoonInstitute for Cardiovascular Science, University College London, Chenies Mews, London WC1E6HX, UK.
Charlotte H ManistyInstitute for Cardiovascular Science, University College London, Chenies Mews, London WC1E6HX, UK.
Barts Health NHS Trust · GBHammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/16/46/32187British Heart Foundation FS/19/35/34374British Heart Foundation NH/17/1/32725British Heart Foundation PG/13/6/29934British Heart Foundation RE/13/4/30184Medical Research Council MC_UP_1102/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsLeft ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in aortic stenosis (AS) varies widely before and after aortic valve replacement (AVR), and deeper phenotyping beyond traditional global measures may improve risk stratification. We hypothesized that machine learning derived 3D LV models may provide a more sensitive assessment of remodelling and sex-related differences in AS than conventional measurements. METHODS AND

resultsOne hundred and sixteen patients with severe, symptomatic AS (54% male, 70 ± 10 years) underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance pre-AVR and 1 year post-AVR. Computational analysis produced co-registered 3D models of wall thickness, which were compared with 40 propensity-matched healthy controls. Preoperative regional wall thickness and post-operative percentage wall thickness regression were analysed, stratified by sex. AS hypertrophy and regression post-AVR was non-uniform-greatest in the septum with more pronounced changes in males than females (wall thickness regression: -13 ± 3.6 vs. -6 ± 1.9%, respectively, P < 0.05). Even patients without LVH (16% with normal indexed LV mass, 79% female) had greater septal and inferior wall thickness compared with controls (8.8 ± 1.6 vs. 6.6 ± 1.2 mm, P < 0.05), which regressed post-AVR. These differences were not detectable by global measures of remodelling. Changes to clinical parameters post-AVR were also greater in males: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) [-37 (interquartile range -88 to -2) vs. -1 (-24 to 11) ng/L, P = 0.008], and systolic blood pressure (12.9 ± 23 vs. 2.1 ± 17 mmHg, P = 0.009), with changes in NT-proBNP correlating with percentage LV mass regression in males only (ß 0.32, P = 0.02).

conclusionIn patients with severe AS, including those without overt LVH, LV remodelling is most plastic in the septum, and greater in males, both pre-AVR and post-AVR. Three-dimensional machine learning is more sensitive than conventional analysis to these changes, potentially enhancing risk stratification. CLINICAL

trial registrationRegression of myocardial fibrosis after aortic valve replacement (RELIEF-AS); NCT02174471. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02174471.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationAortic ValveFemaleHumansHypertrophy, Left VentricularMachine LearningMaleVentricular Function, Leftaortic stenosiscardiac remodellingleft ventricular hypertrophymachine learningsex differences

Identifiers

PMID31280289
PMCPMC7100908
OpenAlexW2955467907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.