ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Additional Surgical Resection After Endoscopic Resection for Patients With High-risk T1 Colorectal Cancer.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk assessment of lymph node metastasis and comparison of treatment modalities for low-risk T1b colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term outcomes of additional surgery versus surveillance-only clinical decision for early colorectal cancer patients after non-curative endoscopic resection: a meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Pooled it
- Risk of recurrence after local resection of T1 rectal cancer: a meta-analysis with meta-regression.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Pooled it
- Surgical resection after endoscopic resection in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- Prediction of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer based on histologic images by artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Transanal endoscopic microsurgery was associated with higher recurrence rate in both low- and high-risk T1 rectal cancer compared to surgical resection.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Does Local Excision Without Salvage Surgery Affect the Prognostic Outcome of Patients With Malignant Colorectal Polyp? A Long-Term Survival Analysis.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Competing Mortality Redefines the Net Benefit of Additional Surgery After Endoscopic Resection for T1 Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Tumour location and mismatch repair status impact gene expression profiles associated with lymph node metastases in T1 colon cancers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Approaches and considerations in the endoscopic treatment of T1 colorectal cancer.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2024Review
- Risk of recurrence in high-risk T1 colon cancer following endoscopic and surgical resection: registry-based cohort study.BJS open · 2024Article
- Right hemicolectomy combined with duodenum-jejunum Roux-en-Y anastomosis for hepatic colon carcinoma invading the duodenum: A single-center case series.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Targeted Nursing Combined with Endoscopic Submucosal Injection of Carbon Nanoparticles in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- En bloc right hemicolectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy for right-sided colon cancer invading duodenum.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of T1 Colorectal Cancer after Endoscopic Resection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal cancer: a review of 53 cases.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimThe purpose of this study was to reveal the safety and efficacy of additional surgical resection (ASR) for high-risk T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) after endoscopic resection (ER). PATIENTS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 191 patients with high-risk T1 CRC after ER.
resultsThe ASR was performed in 176 (92.1%) patients and 15 (7.9%) rejected ASR. All patients that underwent ASR experienced R0 resection; laparoscopic surgery was performed in 159 (90.3%) patients. Clavien-Dindo complications ≥grade II occurred in 33 patients (18.8%). Anastomotic leakage (8.5%) and ileus (5.7%) were the most frequent complications. The anus function was preserved in all patients. Metastatic lymph node was detected in 21 (11.9%) patients. There were no deaths or relapses in patients with ASR. One patient without ASR (6.7%) had a lymph node recurrence.
conclusionASR was safe and effective and is recommended for high-risk T1 CRC patients after ER. A satisfactory long-term outcome can be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.