ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Comparison of
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 1,4-Naphthoquinone (CNN1) Induces Apoptosis through DNA Damage and Promotes Upregulation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Combined Therapy of ATRA and Imatinib Mesylate Decreases BCR-ABL and ABCB1/MDR1 Expression Through Cellular Differentiation in a Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Model.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimChronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative disorder characterized by the presence of breakpoint cluster region-Abelson murine leukemia (BCR-ABL1) gene fusion as a hallmark that is expressed as two major transcripts b2a2 and b3a2. The aim of this study was to compare the BCR-ABL transcripts in the blood cells of patients with CML, and in chemoresistant and chemosensitive CML cell lines to validate their use as a good method to elucidate CML biology. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwelve patients with CML and CML cell lines (K562, K562-LUCENA and FEPS) were analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction to evaluate gene expression of BCR-ABL transcripts.
resultsAll patients had the same expression levels of b2a2 and b3a3 transcripts, however, CML cell lines presented only b3a2 expression. There were no significant differences in absolute b3a2 expression between patients and CML cell lines.
conclusionCML cell lines provide a good in vitro alternative in that they have the same BCR-ABL expression as patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.