Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31280094›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2019

Building CT Radiomics-Based Models for Preoperatively Predicting Malignant Potential and Mitotic Count of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Chao Wang, Hailin Li, Yeerfan Jiaerken, Peiyu Huang, Lifeng Sun, Fei Dong, Yajing Huang, Di Dong, Jie Tian, Minming Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chao WangDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Hailin LiCAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing, China.
Yeerfan JiaerkenDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Peiyu HuangDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Lifeng SunDepartment of Surgical Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Fei DongDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yajing HuangDepartment of Pathology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Di DongCAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing, China. Electronic address: di.dong@ia.ac.cn.
Jie TianCAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, China; Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, China. Electronic address: jie.tian@ia.ac.cn.
Minming ZhangDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. Electronic address: zhangminming@zju.edu.cn.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNShandong Institute of Automation · CNXidian University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo build radiomic prediction models using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) to preoperatively predict malignant potential and mitotic count of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 333 GISTs patients were retrospectively included in our study. Radiomic features were extracted from the preoperative CE-CT images. According to postoperative pathology, patients were categorized by malignant potential and mitotic count, respectively. The most valuable radiomic features were chosen to build a logistic regression model to predict the malignant potential and a random forest classifier model to predict the mitotic count. The performance of radiomic models was assessed with the receiver operating characteristics curve. Our study further developed a radiomic nomogram to preoperatively predict malignant potential in a personalized way for patients with GISTs.

resultsThe predictive model was built to discriminate high- from low-malignant potential GISTs with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.882 (95% CI 0.823-0.942) in the training set and 0.920 (95% CI 0.870-0.971) in the validation set. Moreover, the other radiomic model was built to differentiate high- from low-mitotic count GISTs with an AUC of 0.820 (95% CI 0.753-0.887) in the training set and 0.769 (95% CI 0.654-0.883) in the validation set.

conclusionThe radiomic models using CE-CT showed a good predictive performance for preoperative risk stratification of GISTs and hold great potential for personalized clinical decision making.

Identifiers

PMID31280094
PMCPMC6614115
OpenAlexW2955107871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.