ReviewFungal genetics and biology : FG & B2019
Fungal species boundaries in the genomics era.
Review in Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phylogenomic and Comparative Genomic Analyses Reveal Deep Evolutionary Structure and Cryptic Diversity in the GenusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Genome variation of Sporothrix schenckii and Sporothrix brasiliensis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Morphological and genetic characterization of novelMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Full ribosomal RNA gene arrays confirmParasitology · 2025Article
- Genomic epidemiology ofmBio · 2025Article
- Article
- High Genetic Diversity of Histoplasma in the Amazon Basin, 2006-2017.Emerging infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Comparative mitogenomics analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Genome sequencing and analysis of isolates of Cytospora sorbicola and Cytospora plurivora associated with almond and peach canker.PloS one · 2025Article
- The Good, the Bad, and the Fungus: Insights into the Relationship Between Plants, Fungi, and Oomycetes in Hydroponics.Biology · 2024Review
- Tracing histoplasmosis genomic epidemiology and species occurrence across the USA.Emerging microbes & infections · 2024Article
- Autochthonous Blastomyces dermatitidis, India.Emerging infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Survey, isolation and characterisation ofHeliyon · 2024Article
- Admixture in the fungal pathogen Blastomyces.Genetics · 2024Article
- An integrative taxonomy approach reveals Saccharomyces chiloensis sp. nov. as a newly discovered species from Coastal Patagonia.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Article
- Molecular Diagnostics for Invasive Fungal Diseases: Current and Future Approaches.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- An evolutionary view of the Fusarium core genome.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Phenotypic characterization of cryptic species in the fungal pathogenbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic data has opened new possibilities to understand how organisms change over time, and could enable the discovery of previously undescribed species. Although taxonomy used to be based on phenotypes, molecular data has frequently revealed that morphological traits are insufficient to describe biodiversity. Genomics holds the promise of revealing even more genetic discontinuities, but the parameters on how to describe species from genomic data remain unclear. Fungi have been a successful case in which the use of molecular markers has uncovered the existence of genetic boundaries where no crosses are possible. In this minireview, we highlight recent advances, propose a set of standards to use genomic sequences to uncover species boundaries, point out potential pitfalls, and present possible future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.