Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31279962›Full record

Trial reportCancer treatment and research communications2019

Randomized trial of oral cyclophosphamide versus oral cyclophosphamide with celecoxib for recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.

Rohan Gupta, Mihaela Cristea, Paul Frankel, Christopher Ruel, Chen Chen, Yingyu Wang, Robert Morgan, Lucille Leong, Warren Chow, Marianna Koczywas and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer treatment and research communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rohan GuptaDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Mihaela CristeaDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Paul FrankelInformation Sciences, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Christopher RuelInformation Sciences, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Chen ChenClinical Informatics, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Yingyu WangClinical Informatics, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Robert MorganDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Lucille LeongDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Warren ChowDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Marianna KoczywasDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Steve KoehlerDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Dean LimDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Thehang LuuDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Cynthia MartelDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Mark McNamaraDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
George SomloDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Przemyslaw TwardowskiDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Yun YenDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Amanam IdorenyiDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Tinsley RaechelleClinical Trial Office, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Mary CarrollClinical Trial Office, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States.
Vincent ChungDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States. Electronic address: VChung@coh.org.
City Of Hope National Medical Center · USNational Cancer Center · US

Funding

Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral metronomic chemotherapy, which has low toxicity, has demonstrated promising anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic properties that may lead to prolonged progression-free survival and improved response rates in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). These effects may be enhanced by the co-administration of anti-angiogenic agents.

methodsWe conducted a randomized phase II clinical trial to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of oral metronomic cyclophosphamide (CTX) alone and with the anti-angiogenic drug celecoxib in patients with gynecological malignancies. 52 patients were randomly assigned to two treatments arms: 50 mg oral CTX daily alone (Arm A) or with 400 mg celecoxib twice daily (Arm B). The primary endpoint was response rate. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, time to treatment failure, and overall survival.

resultsIn Arm A (n = 26), 3 patients (12%) had stable disease >6 months and 1 (4%) had a partial response. In Arm B, 5 (19%) had stable disease >6 months and 1 patient (4%) had a partial response. There were no significant between-group differences in overall survival (9.69 months [95% CI 3.84-13.18] vs. 12.55 months [6.67-17.61]) or in median time to treatment failure (1.84 months [1.68-2.76] vs. 1.92 months [1.64-5.22]). The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain.

conclusionsOral metronomic CTX has activity with no major toxicities in heavily pretreated recurrent gynecological cancers and may be considered in patients with indolent disease. We did not observe any additional benefit of celecoxib treatment, though this may be due to small sample sizes.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCelecoxibCyclophosphamideFallopian Tube NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOvarian NeoplasmsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingCelecoxibCyclophosphamideCelecoxibOral cyclophosphamideOvarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID31279962
PMCPMC9018111
OpenAlexW2954863055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.