Trial reportCancer treatment and research communications2019
Randomized trial of oral cyclophosphamide versus oral cyclophosphamide with celecoxib for recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.
Trial report in Cancer treatment and research communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib in Addition to Standard Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Pooled it
- Inexpensive Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers in Ovarian Cancer: An Umbrella Systematic Review of 17 Prognostic Meta-Analyses.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Metronomic Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer: Current Scenario and AI-Integrated Future Strategies.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Cardiotoxicity associated with anticancer therapies for gynecological tumors.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Promising new drugs and therapeutic approaches for treatment of ovarian cancer-targeting the hallmarks of cancer.BMC medicine · 2025Review
- "DEPHENCE" system-a novel regimen of therapy that is urgently needed in the high-grade serous ovarian cancer-a focus on anti-cancer stem cell and anti-tumor microenvironment targeted therapies.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Article
- Metronomic Chemotherapy.Cancers · 2021Review
- Anti-angiogenic therapy in ovarian cancer: current situation & prospects.The Indian journal of medical research · 2021Review
- Effect of the drug cyclophosphamide on the activity of porcine kidney betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOral metronomic chemotherapy, which has low toxicity, has demonstrated promising anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic properties that may lead to prolonged progression-free survival and improved response rates in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). These effects may be enhanced by the co-administration of anti-angiogenic agents.
methodsWe conducted a randomized phase II clinical trial to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of oral metronomic cyclophosphamide (CTX) alone and with the anti-angiogenic drug celecoxib in patients with gynecological malignancies. 52 patients were randomly assigned to two treatments arms: 50 mg oral CTX daily alone (Arm A) or with 400 mg celecoxib twice daily (Arm B). The primary endpoint was response rate. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, time to treatment failure, and overall survival.
resultsIn Arm A (n = 26), 3 patients (12%) had stable disease >6 months and 1 (4%) had a partial response. In Arm B, 5 (19%) had stable disease >6 months and 1 patient (4%) had a partial response. There were no significant between-group differences in overall survival (9.69 months [95% CI 3.84-13.18] vs. 12.55 months [6.67-17.61]) or in median time to treatment failure (1.84 months [1.68-2.76] vs. 1.92 months [1.64-5.22]). The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain.
conclusionsOral metronomic CTX has activity with no major toxicities in heavily pretreated recurrent gynecological cancers and may be considered in patients with indolent disease. We did not observe any additional benefit of celecoxib treatment, though this may be due to small sample sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.