ArticleBMC family practice2019
Patients' health literacy in relation to the preference for a general practitioner as the source of health information.
Article in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Potential role of regular physicians in improving health literacy in patients with chronic diseases: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Korea.Korean journal of family medicine · 2026Article
- Māori perspectives on a potential low dose CT lung cancer screening programme in Aotearoa New Zealand: results of a mixed-method cross-sectional survey.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Implementation Factors of Digital Health Interventions in Depression Care-The Perspective of Health Professionals.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- To facilitate realisation of access, participation, and equity in healthcare: an interview study with policy makers in a Swedish region.BMC public health · 2025Article
- An Exploration of the Content and Language Used in Publicly Available National Health Service Patient Information Leaflets for People Considering Shoulder Replacement Surgery: A Qualitative Study.Musculoskeletal care · 2025Article
- Effect of Health Literacy on Antiviral Treatment of Hepatitis B: Instrumental Variable Analysis.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Social media has become a mainstream source of medical information for patients with rheumatic diseases: a cross-sectional survey of patients.Rheumatology international · 2024Article
- Assessment and Acquisition of Knowledge Regarding Urinary Tract Infection Among Adult Women in the United States.Urology · 2024Article
- "I do not know the advantages of having a general practitioner" - a qualitative study exploring the views of low-acuity emergency patients without a regular general practitioner toward primary care.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Exploring the Experience of Breathlessness with the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The role of primary care in informing and supporting people with limited health literacy in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Do health literacy levels of nursing students change throughout the study programme? A cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Age-friendly neighbourhoods and physical activity of older Surinamese individuals in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- Lifting the Digital Curtain: Utilizing Social Media to Promote Health Content and Engage with Asian Populations.Journal of Asian health · 2022Article
- Preferences and Experiences of People with Chronic Illness in Using Different Sources of Health Information: Results of a Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Health literacy, health perception and related factors among different ethnic groups: a cross-sectional study in southeastern Turkey.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Patients' Use and Perceptions of a Drug-Drug Interaction Database: A Survey of Janusmed Interactions.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Cross-National Survey of People Living with Hemophilia: Impact on Daily Living and Patient Education in Central Europe.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor many patients, the general practitioner (GP) is the most important point of contact for obtaining information about a wide range of health topics. However, patients with different characteristics may seek health information from different sources, such as friends or the internet. The relationship between patient characteristics and preferences for information sources is understudied. We investigate which information sources are used by patients for health-related questions and how this relates to patients' sociodemographics, health, and health literacy.
methodsA stratified and population-based survey was conducted to investigate health information sources within the German population over 35 years (n = 4144). Sociodemographics, use of technology, health-related indicators, and health literacy (including self-efficacy and action planning), as well as questions regarding the ratings of multiple health-related information sources, were investigated in personal interviews and analyzed using logistic regression.
resultsIn our study, GPs were the most important source of information for the patients, followed by medical specialists, pharmacists and the internet. Patient age and number of illnesses were associated with the choice of information source. Furthermore, action planning and self-efficacy for acquiring health knowledge were associated with the selected source of information.
conclusionsInformation provider appears to be an important role for GPs, particularly among old and chronically ill patients. GPs should have the specific capabilities to fill this role and should be trained and referred to accordingly. Self-efficacy and action planning for acquiring health knowledge are important patient factors doctors can use for brief inventions during consultations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.