Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31279065›Full record

ArticleThe ocular surface2019

Therapeutic efficacy of different routes of mesenchymal stem cell administration in corneal injury.

Sachin Shukla, Sharad K Mittal, William Foulsham, Elsayed Elbasiony, Disha Singhania, Srikant K Sahu, Sunil K Chauhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ocular surface, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Long-Term Tolerability and Safety of AAV5-Id3 Gene Therapy to Eyes.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Animal Models in Eye Research: Focus on Corneal Pathologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sachin ShuklaSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Ocular Regeneration, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Sharad K MittalSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
William FoulshamSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
Elsayed ElbasionySchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Disha SinghaniaSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Srikant K SahuSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. Electronic address: srikantsahu@lvpei.org.
Sunil K ChauhanSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: sunil_chauhan@meei.harvard.edu.
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

VISION RESEARCHP30EY003790 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Patricia Ann D'Amore · 1985 to 2026
$25.5M
Ocular Immune Regulation by Mesenchymal Stem CellsR01EY024602 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CHAUHAN, SUNIL K · 2015 to 2025
$6.5M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003790NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCorneal injuries are associated with significant impairment in vision. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been shown to limit inflammation and promote tissue repair at the ocular surface. Here, we evaluate the efficacies of different modes of MSC delivery (topical, subconjunctival, intraperitoneal [IP] and intravenous [IV]) to promote tissue repair and restore corneal transparency in a murine model of corneal injury.

methodsMSCs were purified from the bone marrow of C57BL/6  mice and expanded using plastic adherence in vitro. Corneal injury was created using an Algerbrush, and 0.5 × 10

resultsSubconjunctival or IV administration results in increased frequencies of MSCs in ocular surface tissues following corneal injury, relative to topical or intraperitoneal delivery. Subconjunctival or IV administration reduces: (i) corneal opacity, (ii) tissue fibrosis as quantified by α-Sma expression, (iii) the expression of inflammatory cytokines (Il-1β and Tnf-α) and (iv) CD45

conclusionsOur data suggest that subconjunctival or IV delivery of MSCs has superior therapeutic efficacy compared to topical or IP delivery following corneal injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsCorneaCorneal InjuriesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleInjectionsMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMiceMice, Inbred C57BLTreatment OutcomeCorneal injuryHomingInflammationMesenchymal stem cellsWound healing

Identifiers

PMID31279065
PMCPMC6874749
OpenAlexW2954292745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.