Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31278683›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2019

Scalable Workflows and Reproducible Data Analysis for Genomics.

Francesco Strozzi, Roel Janssen, Ricardo Wurmus, Michael R Crusoe, George Githinji, Paolo Di Tommaso, Dominique Belhachemi, Steffen Möller, Geert Smant, Joep de Ligt and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Overcoming Data Bottlenecks in Genomic Pathogen Surveillance.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. pyrpipe: a Python package for RNA-Seq workflows.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Francesco StrozziEnterome Bioscience, Paris, France.
Roel JanssenDepartment of Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ricardo WurmusBIMSB Scientific Bioinformatics Platform, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Michael R CrusoeCommon Workflow Language Project, Vilnius, Lithuania.
George GithinjiKEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Paolo Di TommasoCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Dominique BelhachemiLife Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA.
Steffen MöllerInstitute for Biostatistics and Informatics in Medicine and Ageing Research (IBIMA), Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Geert SmantLaboratory of Nematology, Department of Plant Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Joep de LigtDepartment of Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pjotr PrinsDepartment of Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. pjotr2018@thebird.nl.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLCentre for Genomic Regulation · ESEnterome (France) · FRGraduate School Experimental Plant Sciences · NLKenya Medical Research Institute · KEMax Delbrück Center · DEUniversity of Rostock · DEUtrecht University · NL

Funding

A Unified High Performance Web Service for Systems Genetics and Precision MedicineR01GM123489 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI PRINS, PJOTR, SEN, SAUNAK · 2017 to 2024
$3.7M
Wellcome Trust 203077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological, clinical, and pharmacological research now often involves analyses of genomes, transcriptomes, proteomes, and interactomes, within and between individuals and across species. Due to large volumes, the analysis and integration of data generated by such high-throughput technologies have become computationally intensive, and analysis can no longer happen on a typical desktop computer.In this chapter we show how to describe and execute the same analysis using a number of workflow systems and how these follow different approaches to tackle execution and reproducibility issues. We show how any researcher can create a reusable and reproducible bioinformatics pipeline that can be deployed and run anywhere. We show how to create a scalable, reusable, and shareable workflow using four different workflow engines: the Common Workflow Language (CWL), Guix Workflow Language (GWL), Snakemake, and Nextflow. Each of which can be run in parallel.We show how to bundle a number of tools used in evolutionary biology by using Debian, GNU Guix, and Bioconda software distributions, along with the use of container systems, such as Docker, GNU Guix, and Singularity. Together these distributions represent the overall majority of software packages relevant for biology, including PAML, Muscle, MAFFT, MrBayes, and BLAST. By bundling software in lightweight containers, they can be deployed on a desktop, in the cloud, and, increasingly, on compute clusters.By bundling software through these public software distributions, and by creating reproducible and shareable pipelines using these workflow engines, not only do bioinformaticians have to spend less time reinventing the wheel but also do we get closer to the ideal of making science reproducible. The examples in this chapter allow a quick comparison of different solutions.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenomicsBig DataBiological EvolutionCloud ComputingData AnalysisHumansReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareWorkflowBig dataBiocondaBioinformaticsCloud computingCluster computingCommon Workflow LanguageCWLDebian LinuxEvolutionary biologyGNU GuixGuix Workflow LanguageMPIMrBayesNextflowParallelizationSnakemakeVirtual machine

Identifiers

PMID31278683
PMCPMC7613310
OpenAlexW2954309769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.