ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2019
Scalable Workflows and Reproducible Data Analysis for Genomics.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Umi-pipeline-nf: a modular and scalable workflow for UMI-tagged nanopore amplicon analysis with real-time sequencing integration and GPU-acceleration.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Playbook workflow builder: Interactive construction of bioinformatics workflows.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- COWID: an efficient cloud-based genomics workflow for scalable identification of SARS-COV-2.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- A spectrum of free software tools for processing the VCF variant call format: vcflib, bio-vcf, cyvcf2, hts-nim and slivar.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Article
- A simple guide to de novo transcriptome assembly and annotation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Review
- Ten simple rules for making a software tool workflow-ready.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Overcoming Data Bottlenecks in Genomic Pathogen Surveillance.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021Article
- Design considerations for workflow management systems use in production genomics research and the clinic.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- pyrpipe: a Python package for RNA-Seq workflows.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Streamlining data-intensive biology with workflow systems.GigaScience · 2021Article
- Large-scale quality assessment of prokaryotic genomes with metashot/prok-quality.F1000Research · 2021Article
- Software-Defined Workflows for Distributed Interoperable Closed-Loop Neuromodulation Control Systems.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021Article
- Geniac: Automatic Configuration GENerator and Installer for nextflow pipelines.Open research Europe · 2021Article
- Bioinformatics recipes: creating, executing and distributing reproducible data analysis workflows.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Biological, clinical, and pharmacological research now often involves analyses of genomes, transcriptomes, proteomes, and interactomes, within and between individuals and across species. Due to large volumes, the analysis and integration of data generated by such high-throughput technologies have become computationally intensive, and analysis can no longer happen on a typical desktop computer.In this chapter we show how to describe and execute the same analysis using a number of workflow systems and how these follow different approaches to tackle execution and reproducibility issues. We show how any researcher can create a reusable and reproducible bioinformatics pipeline that can be deployed and run anywhere. We show how to create a scalable, reusable, and shareable workflow using four different workflow engines: the Common Workflow Language (CWL), Guix Workflow Language (GWL), Snakemake, and Nextflow. Each of which can be run in parallel.We show how to bundle a number of tools used in evolutionary biology by using Debian, GNU Guix, and Bioconda software distributions, along with the use of container systems, such as Docker, GNU Guix, and Singularity. Together these distributions represent the overall majority of software packages relevant for biology, including PAML, Muscle, MAFFT, MrBayes, and BLAST. By bundling software in lightweight containers, they can be deployed on a desktop, in the cloud, and, increasingly, on compute clusters.By bundling software through these public software distributions, and by creating reproducible and shareable pipelines using these workflow engines, not only do bioinformaticians have to spend less time reinventing the wheel but also do we get closer to the ideal of making science reproducible. The examples in this chapter allow a quick comparison of different solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.