Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31278642›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

Evaluation of biomedical waste management practices in public and private sector of health care facilities in India.

Aruna Devi, Khaiwal Ravindra, Manmeet Kaur, Rajesh Kumar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Insights of healthcare waste management practices in Vietnam.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aruna DeviDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Khaiwal RavindraDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India. Khaiwal@yahoo.com.
Manmeet KaurDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Rajesh KumarDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proper management of biomedical waste (BMW) is required to avoid environmental and human health risks. The current study evaluated the BWM practices in public and private health care facilities of Fatehgarh Sahib District in Punjab, India. The study was conducted, using a modified World Health Organization (WHO) tool in 120 health care facilities randomly selected from rural and urban areas. At primary health care level, BMW management guidelines were followed in 67.2% of the public sector and 40.4% of the private sector facilities, whereas in secondary health care sectors both private and public sector follows 100% compliance. Health facilities were graded into different categories according to median score, i.e., scores less than < 2.5 was categorized as red (no credible BMW management system in place), scores between 2.5 to 7.5 as yellow (system present but needs major improvement) and scores > 7.5 as green (good system in place for BMW). It was observed that among primary health care facilities, 85% of the public sector and 64% of private sector facilities falls in the red category, whereas for secondary health care facilities only 8% fall in the red category. Logistic regression helped to identify the major factors that affect the performance of the health care facility, and it shows that regular training on BMW and improved infrastructure can improve the BMW management practices. Further, proper management of BMW requires multi-sectoral coordination, which can be better addressed through policies and by providing periodical training to all stakeholders.

Indexed as

Waste ManagementHealth FacilitiesHumansIndiaPrivate SectorPublic SectorBiomedical wasteCBWTFHealth care facilitiesHealth hazardsLogistic regression

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.