Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31278577›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis.

Thierry Lefebvre, Claire Wartelle-Bladou, Philip Wong, Giada Sebastiani, Jeanne-Marie Giard, Hélène Castel, Jessica Murphy-Lavallée, Damien Olivié, André Ilinca, Marie-Pierre Sylvestre and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02044523 (Comparison of Magnetic Resonance and Ultrasound Elastography With Liver Biopsy for Noninvasive Staging of Liver Fibrosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02044523 completednot on this map

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance and Ultrasound Elastography With Liver Biopsy for Noninvasive Staging of Liver Fibrosis

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)Ran2014 to 2018Enrolled108ConditionsHepatitis C, Hepatitis B, Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)ArmsTransient elastography, acoustic radiation force impulse, magnetic resonance elastography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Clinical value of [Japanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. MR Elastography: Practical Questions, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Thierry LefebvreDepartment of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Claire Wartelle-BladouDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Philip WongDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Canada.
Giada SebastianiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Canada.
Jeanne-Marie GiardCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Hélène CastelCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Jessica Murphy-LavalléeDepartment of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Damien OliviéDepartment of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
André IlincaDepartment of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Marie-Pierre SylvestreCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Guillaume GilbertDepartment of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Zu-Hua GaoDepartment of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Bich N NguyenService of Pathology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Guy CloutierDepartment of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
An TangDepartment of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada. an.tang@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8967-5503
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CACARE Canada · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 26993Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 27127Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 34875Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 34939Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes 273738Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes 301520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo perform head-to-head comparisons of the feasibility and diagnostic performance of transient elastography (TE), point shear-wave elastography (pSWE), and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).

methodsThis prospective, cross-sectional, dual-center imaging study included 100 patients with known or suspected chronic liver disease caused by hepatitis B or C virus, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, or autoimmune hepatitis identified between 2014 and 2018. Liver stiffness measured with the three elastographic techniques was obtained within 6 weeks of a liver biopsy. Confounding effects of inflammation and steatosis on association between fibrosis and liver stiffness were assessed. Obuchowski scores and AUCs for staging fibrosis were evaluated and the latter were compared using the DeLong method.

resultsTE, pSWE, and MRE were technically feasible and reliable in 92%, 79%, and 91% subjects, respectively. At univariate analysis, liver stiffness measured by all techniques increased with fibrosis stages and inflammation and decreased with steatosis. For classification of dichotomized fibrosis stages, the AUCs were significantly higher for distinguishing stages F0 vs. ≥ F1 with MRE than with TE (0.88 vs. 0.71; p < 0.05) or pSWE (0.88 vs. 0.73; p < 0.05), and for distinguishing stages ≤ F1 vs. ≥ F2 with MRE than with TE (0.85 vs. 0.75; p < 0.05). TE, pSWE, and MRE Obuchowski scores for staging fibrosis stages were respectively 0.89 (95% CI 0.85-0.93), 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.94), and 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.96).

conclusionMRE provided a higher diagnostic performance than TE and pSWE for staging early stages of liver fibrosis.

trial registrationNCT02044523 KEY POINTS: • The technical failure rate was similar between MRE and US-based elastography techniques. • Liver stiffness measured by MRE and US-based elastography techniques increased with fibrosis stages and inflammation and decreased with steatosis. • MRE provided a diagnostic accuracy higher than US-based elastography techniques for staging of early stages of histology-determined liver fibrosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesElasticity Imaging TechniquesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLiverLiver CirrhosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexYoung AdultClassificationElasticity imaging techniquesFibrosisLiverProspective studies

Identifiers

PMID31278577
OpenAlexW2953660200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.