ArticleEuropean radiology2019
How patient off-centering impacts organ dose and image noise in pediatric head and thoracoabdominal CT.
Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of radiation dose to the eye lens from pediatric brain computed tomography scans.Pediatric radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Automatic patient centering in computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Patient Centring in CT: An International Survey of Clinical Practice and Future Directions.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
- Influence of Off-Centre Positioning, Scan Direction, and Localiser Projection Angle on Organ-Specific Radiation Doses in Low-Dose Chest CT: A Simulation Study Across Four Scanner Models.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Clinical implications of lateral head mis-centering on eye lens dose in pediatric computed tomography examinations: a phantom study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Quantifying Patient Positioning Errors and Radiation Dose Variation in Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2026Article
- Fully automated accurate patient positioning in computed tomography using anterior-posterior localizer images and a deep neural network: a dual-center study.European radiology · 2023Article
- Photon-counting CT of elbow joint fractures: image quality in a simulated post-trauma setting with off-center positioning.European radiology experimental · 2023Article
- Ultra-high resolution computed tomography of joints: practical recommendations for acquisition protocol optimization.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Recent updates in radioprotection.European radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the impact of patient off-centering on organ dose and image noise for head and thoracoabdominal CT in a pediatric phantom.
methodsAn anthropomorphic phantom simulating a 5-year-old child was used. Semiconductor dosimeters were placed in various cranial and thoracoabdominal organs. Head and thoracoabdominal CT were performed using automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) and default bowtie filters. The phantom was imaged repeatedly at vertical table positions ranging from - 6 to + 6 cm from the 0-position. Tube current time products (TCTP), organ doses, and image noise were recorded. Scatter radiation was measured in the thyroid for head CT. The effect of ATCM and bowtie filters was assessed.
resultsDepending on patient position, organ doses differed up to 22% for the supratentorial brain, 34% for the infratentorial brain, 19% for the eyes, 28% for the lungs, 25% for the stomach, and 22% for the liver compared with those in the 0-position. The relation between position and dose was linear and mainly affected by the bowtie filter in head CT, while it was quadratic and affected by ATCM and bowtie filter in thoracoabdominal CT. It further depended on the relative position of each organ to the isocenter. An inverse relation was found between position and image noise. Scatter radiation was not significantly related to patient positioning (p = 0.21).
conclusionsIn pediatric CT, vertical patient positioning had a substantial impact on radiation dose with differences of up to 34%, depending on the body region and location of each individual organ. KEY POINTS: • Patient off-centering has a substantial impact on organ radiation dose and image noise in pediatric CT. • Impact of patient off-centering on radiation dose and noise differs between head and thoracoabdominal CT. • Differences are caused by both ATCM and bowtie filter in thoracoabdominal CT, but mainly by bowtie filter in head CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.