Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31278571›Full record

ReviewBrain structure & function2019

A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Alvaro Duque, Reynold Spector

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain structure & function, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neuropsychiatric events associated with montelukast in patients with asthma: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alvaro DuqueDepartment of Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, SHM C317B, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. alvaro.duque@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5086-5438
Reynold SpectorDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, 08554, USA. mspec007@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7892-9555

Funding

Yale Macaque Brain ResourceR01MH113257 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Alvaro Duque · 2017 to 2026
$4.3M
NIMH NIH HHS NIMH R01-MH113257NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a widespread belief that neurogenesis exists in adult human brain, especially in the dentate gyrus, and it is to be maintained and, if possible, augmented with different stimuli including exercise and certain drugs. Here, we examine the evidence for adult human neurogenesis and note important limitations of the methodologies used to study it. A balanced review of the literature and evaluation of the data indicate that adult neurogenesis in human brain is improbable. In fact, in several high-quality recent studies in adult human brain, unlike in adult brains of other species, neurogenesis was not detectable. These findings suggest that the human brain requires a permanent set of neurons to maintain acquired knowledge for decades, which is essential for complex high cognitive functions unique to humans. Thus, stimulation and/or injection of neural stem cells into human brains may not only disrupt brain homeostatic systems, but also disturb normal neuronal circuits. We propose that the focus of research should be the preservation of brain neurons by prevention of damage, not replacement.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain InjuriesCell DifferentiationHumansMental DisordersNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisNeuronsAdult neurogenesisBromodeoxyuridineDNA repair/methylationHomeostasisMemoryNeural stem cellsNeuronal protection

Identifiers

PMID31278571
PMCPMC6852840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.