ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2019
Overcoming Challenges in Process Development of Cellular Therapies.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Sensitive and Controlled Data-Independent Acquisition Method for Proteomic Analysis of Cell Therapies.Journal of proteome research · 2022Article
- Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular Consensus on genetically modified cells. V: Manufacture and quality control.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy · 2021Article
- Robust Antitumor Activity and Low Cytokine Production by Novel Humanized Anti-CD19 CAR T Cells.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2021Article
- Lymphocyte expansion in bioreactors: upgrading adoptive cell therapy.Journal of biological engineering · 2021Review
- Establishment of a cell processing laboratory to support hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2021Article
- Additional possibilities of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells in B-cell lymphoma: combination therapy.Translational cancer research · 2020Review
- Development of CAR-T cell therapy for B-ALL using a point-of-care approach.Oncoimmunology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of the reviewCellular therapy using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells as a treatment option for patients with lymphoma and leukemia has proven to be remarkably efficacious. This success has sparked the development of new cellular therapy products for numerous indications. Similar to pharmaceutical products, challenges exist at nearly every stage of process development; however, the unique nature of a cellular therapy product can present exceptional challenges that are just beginning to emerge. The purpose of this review is to explore some of the most common challenges experienced during the early phases of development of CAR T cell products and to provide suggestions for navigating these challenges. RECENT
findingsRecent articles focused on CAR T cells are highlighted with special attention on aspects that relate to CAR T cell process development and clinical manufacturing. We examine the various stages of process development for CAR T cells and outline some of the obstacles that must be overcome in order to move from pre-clinical development into clinical manufacturing. As the field of CAR T cell therapy continues to grow, it is important to quickly move new CAR T cell products into and through early phase clinical trials and to ensure that the result of these trials can be adequately compared. Having laboratory and clinical investigators and GMP manufacturing facilities aligned on the numerous aspects of new product development will facilitate this process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31278568What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.