Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31278567›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2019

Moral Disengagement of Pure Bullies and Bully/Victims: Shared and Distinct Mechanisms.

Kevin C Runions, Thérèse Shaw, Kay Bussey, Robert Thornberg, Christina Salmivalli, Donna S Cross

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Association between Child Abuse, Depression, and School Bullying among Chinese Secondary School Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kevin C RunionsTelethon Kids Institute, Perth Children's Hospital, PO Box 855, West Perth, WA, 6009, Australia. kevin.runions@telethonkids.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8770-8743
Thérèse ShawTelethon Kids Institute, Perth Children's Hospital, PO Box 855, West Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Kay BusseyCentre for Emotional Health, C3A 731, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Robert ThornbergDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, SE-58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Christina SalmivalliDepartment of Psychology, University of Turku, Assistentinkatu 7, 20500, Turku, Finland.
Donna S CrossTelethon Kids Institute, Perth Children's Hospital, PO Box 855, West Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
The Kids Research Institute Australia · AULinköping University · SEMacquarie University · AUUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast majority of adolescents recognize that bullying is morally wrong, yet bullying remains a problem in secondary schools, indicating young people may disengage from their moral values to engage in bullying. But it is unclear whether the same mechanisms enabling moral disengagement are active for bully/victims (who both bully and are bullied) as for pure bullies (who are not targets of bullying). This study tested the hypotheses that mechanisms of moral disengagement, including blaming the victim and minimizing the impact of bullying, may operate differently in bully/victims compared to pure bullies. From a sample of 1895 students from grades 7-9 (50.6% female; 83.4% from English speaking homes), 1870 provided self-reports on bullying involvement and mechanisms of moral disengagement associated with bullying. Two cut-offs were compared for bullying involvement (as perpetrator and as target of bullying) during the previous school term: a conservative cut-off (every few weeks or more often) and a liberal cut-off (once-or-twice). Using the conservative cut-off, both pure bullies and bully/victims enlisted moral disengagement mechanisms to justify bullying more than did uninvolved students and pure victims, with no significant difference in scores on any of the moral disengagement scales between pure bullies and bully/victims. For the liberal cut-off, bully/victims reported lower overall moral disengagement scores than did pure bullies, and specifically less distortion of consequences, diffusion of responsibility, and euphemistic labeling. This study advances bullying research by extending the role of moral disengagement in bullying episodes beyond pure bullies to victims, both pure victims and bully/victims. Examination of specific moral disengagement mechanisms and the extent of involvement in bullying enabled a more nuanced differentiation between the bullying groups. These results will inform future interventions aimed at reducing the use of moral disengagement mechanisms that sustain bullying and victimization. Targeted interventions are needed to challenge specific moral disengagement mechanisms from the perspectives of pure bullies and bully/victims.

Indexed as

Social PerceptionAdolescentBullyingCrime VictimsFemaleHumansMaleMoralsSchoolsSelf ConceptSelf ReportStudentsAdolescentsBullyingBully/VictimMoral disengagementPeer victimization

Identifiers

PMID31278567
OpenAlexW2955772207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.