Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31278396›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2019

Alternative tumour-specific antigens.

Christof C Smith, Sara R Selitsky, Shengjie Chai, Paul M Armistead, Benjamin G Vincent, Jonathan S Serody

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06225284 (A Randomized Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without GnRH Agonist for Premenopausal Triple-negative Early Breast Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 225 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
225citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06225284 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without GnRH Agonist for Premenopausal Triple-negative Early Breast Cancer Patients: ESCALATE Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2024 to 2030Enrolled124ConditionsTriple Negative Breast Cancer, Premenopausal Breast CancerArmsGoserelin Acetate 3.6mg、Goserelin Acetate 10.8mg、Leuprolide Acetate 3.75mg、Leuprorelin Acetate 22.5mg、Triptorelin pamoate 11.25mg、Triptorelin pamoate 22.5mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

225 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Alternative splicing and cancer: a systematic review.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Designing lysate-based hydrogels for on-demand therapy.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

165 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christof C SmithDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Marsico Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6517-0439
Sara R SelitskyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Shengjie ChaiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Marsico Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Paul M ArmisteadLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Benjamin G VincentDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Marsico Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. benjamin_vincent@med.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1762-2282
Jonathan S SerodyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Marsico Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. jonathan_serody@med.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4568-1092

Funding

Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
Small Animal Imaging CoreU54CA198999 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KABANOV, ALEXANDER V · 2015 to 2019
$11.9M
Leukemia Specific Splice Isoforms as Neo-Antigens for T-Cell ImmunotherapyR01CA201225 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ARMISTEAD, PAUL MICHAEL · 2016 to 2020
$2.3M
Design and Delivery of Neoantigen-based Tumor VaccinesF30CA225136 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SMITH, CHRISTOF CHIU · 2018 to 2021
$142k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA225136NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201225NCI NIH HHS U54 CA198999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of tumour-specific antigens (TSAs) as targets for antitumour therapies has accelerated within the past decade. The most commonly studied class of TSAs are those derived from non-synonymous single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), or SNV neoantigens. However, to increase the repertoire of available therapeutic TSA targets, 'alternative TSAs', defined here as high-specificity tumour antigens arising from non-SNV genomic sources, have recently been evaluated. Among these alternative TSAs are antigens derived from mutational frameshifts, splice variants, gene fusions, endogenous retroelements and other processes. Unlike the patient-specific nature of SNV neoantigens, some alternative TSAs may have the advantage of being widely shared by multiple tumours, allowing for universal, off-the-shelf therapies. In this Opinion article, we will outline the biology, available computational tools, preclinical and/or clinical studies and relevant cancers for each alternative TSA class, as well as discuss both current challenges preventing the therapeutic application of alternative TSAs and potential solutions to aid in their clinical translation.

Indexed as

MutationAlternative SplicingAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmComputational BiologyFrameshift MutationGene FusionGenomicsHumansINDEL MutationMiceNeoplasmsAntigens, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID31278396
PMCPMC6874891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.