Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31278369›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Bacterial Density and Biofilm Structure Determined by Optical Coherence Tomography.

Jiapeng Hou, Can Wang, René T Rozenbaum, Niar Gusnaniar, Ed D de Jong, Willem Woudstra, Gésinda I Geertsema-Doornbusch, Jelly Atema-Smit, Jelmer Sjollema, Yijin Ren and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. UnderstandingMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Differentiation of otitis media-causing bacteria and biofilmsFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jiapeng HouUniversity of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, P.O. Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Can WangUniversity of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Orthodontics, Hanzeplein 1, 9713, GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
René T RozenbaumUniversity of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, P.O. Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Niar GusnaniarUniversity of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, P.O. Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ed D de JongUniversity of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, P.O. Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Willem WoudstraUniversity of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, P.O. Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Gésinda I Geertsema-DoornbuschUniversity of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, P.O. Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jelly Atema-SmitUniversity of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, P.O. Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jelmer SjollemaUniversity of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, P.O. Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0714-3082
Yijin RenUniversity of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Orthodontics, Hanzeplein 1, 9713, GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Henk J BusscherUniversity of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, P.O. Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Henny C van der MeiUniversity of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, P.O. Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands. h.c.van.der.mei@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0760-8900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical-coherence-tomography (OCT) is a non-destructive tool for biofilm imaging, not requiring staining, and used to measure biofilm thickness and putative comparison of biofilm structure based on signal intensity distributions in OCT-images. Quantitative comparison of biofilm signal intensities in OCT-images, is difficult due to the auto-scaling applied in OCT-instruments to ensure optimal quality of individual images. Here, we developed a method to eliminate the influence of auto-scaling in order to allow quantitative comparison of biofilm densities in different images. Auto- and re-scaled signal intensities could be qualitatively interpreted in line with biofilm characteristics for single and multi-species biofilms of different strains and species (cocci and rod-shaped organisms), demonstrating qualitative validity of auto- and re-scaling analyses. However, specific features of pseudomonas and oral multi-species biofilms were more prominently expressed after re-scaling. Quantitative validation was obtained by relating average auto- and re-scaled signal intensities across biofilm images with volumetric-bacterial-densities in biofilms, independently obtained using enumeration of bacterial numbers per unit biofilm volume. The signal intensities in auto-scaled biofilm images did not significantly relate with volumetric-bacterial-densities, whereas re-scaled intensities in images of biofilms of widely different strains and species increased linearly with independently determined volumetric-bacterial-densities in the biofilms. Herewith, the proposed re-scaling of signal intensity distributions in OCT-images significantly enhances the possibilities of biofilm imaging using OCT.

Indexed as

BiofilmsTomography, Optical CoherenceAlgorithmsBacteriaModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID31278369
PMCPMC6611762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.