Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31278367›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Uncovering biomarker genes with enriched classification potential from Hallmark gene sets.

Colin A Targonski, Courtney A Shearer, Benjamin T Shealy, Melissa C Smith, F Alex Feltus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Transfer transcriptomic signatures for infectious diseases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Diagnostic blood RNA profiles for human acute spinal cord injury.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Colin A TargonskiClemson University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Courtney A ShearerClemson University, Department of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Benjamin T ShealyClemson University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Melissa C SmithClemson University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
F Alex FeltusClemson University, Department of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA. ffeltus@clemson.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2123-6114

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the complex relationship between gene expression and phenotypic outcomes, computationally efficient approaches are needed to sift through large high-dimensional datasets in order to identify biologically relevant biomarkers. In this report, we describe a method of identifying the most salient biomarker genes in a dataset, which we call "candidate genes", by evaluating the ability of gene combinations to classify samples from a dataset, which we call "classification potential". Our algorithm, Gene Oracle, uses a neural network to test user defined gene sets for polygenic classification potential and then uses a combinatorial approach to further decompose selected gene sets into candidate and non-candidate biomarker genes. We tested this algorithm on curated gene sets from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) quantified in RNAseq gene expression matrices obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) data repositories. First, we identified which MSigDB Hallmark subsets have significant classification potential for both the TCGA and GTEx datasets. Then, we identified the most discriminatory candidate biomarker genes in each Hallmark gene set and provide evidence that the improved biomarker potential of these genes may be due to reduced functional complexity.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseOncogenesAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGene OntologyHumansBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID31278367
PMCPMC6611793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.