Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31278309›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Dissecting the role of the gut microbiota and diet on visceral fat mass accumulation.

Caroline I Le Roy, Ruth C E Bowyer, Juan E Castillo-Fernandez, Tess Pallister, Cristina Menni, Claire J Steves, Sarah E Berry, Tim D Spector, Jordana T Bell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The gut microbiome as a modulator of healthy ageing.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline I Le RoyThe Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, Kings College London, 3-4th Floor South Wing Block D, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7E, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0341-751X
Ruth C E BowyerThe Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, Kings College London, 3-4th Floor South Wing Block D, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7E, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6941-8160
Juan E Castillo-FernandezThe Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, Kings College London, 3-4th Floor South Wing Block D, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7E, London, UK.
Tess PallisterThe Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, Kings College London, 3-4th Floor South Wing Block D, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7E, London, UK.
Cristina MenniThe Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, Kings College London, 3-4th Floor South Wing Block D, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7E, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9790-0571
Claire J StevesThe Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, Kings College London, 3-4th Floor South Wing Block D, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7E, London, UK.
Sarah E BerryDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK.
Tim D SpectorThe Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, Kings College London, 3-4th Floor South Wing Block D, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7E, London, UK.
Jordana T BellThe Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, Kings College London, 3-4th Floor South Wing Block D, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7E, London, UK. jordana.bell@kcl.ac.uk.
St Thomas' Hospital · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation SP/14/8/31352Medical Research Council MR/M016560/1Medical Research Council MR/N01183X/1Medical Research Council MR/N030125/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/S020845/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both gut microbiota and diet have been shown to impact visceral fat mass (VFM), a major risk factor for cardiometabolic disease, but their relative contribution has not been well characterised. We aimed to estimate and separate the effect of gut microbiota composition from that of nutrient intake on VFM in 1760 older female twins. Through pairwise association analyses, we identified 93 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and 10 nutrients independently linked to VFM (FDR < 5%). Conditional analyses revealed that the majority (87%) of the 93 VFM-associated OTUs remained significantly associated with VFM irrespective of nutrient intake correction. In contrast, we observed that the effect of fibre, magnesium, biotin and vitamin E on VFM was partially mediated by OTUs. Moreover, we estimated that OTUs were more accurate predictors of VFM than nutrients and accounted for a larger percentage of its variance. Our results suggest that while the role of certain nutrients on VFM appears to depend on gut microbiota composition, specific gut microbes may affect host adiposity regardless of dietary intake. The findings imply that the gut microbiota may have a greater contribution towards shaping host VFM than diet alone. Thus, microbial-based therapy should be prioritised for VFM reduction in overweight and obese subjects.

Indexed as

DietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAgedBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansIntra-Abdominal FatMaleMetagenomicsMiddle AgedNutrientsOrgan SizeNutrients

Identifiers

PMID31278309
PMCPMC6611773
OpenAlexW2953810776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.