ArticleNature communications2019
Untangling the evolutionary roots of lung cancer.
Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct genomic landscape of non-small cell lung cancer in Bangladeshi patients: Implications for precision oncology in a resource-limited setting.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Prospective validation of ORACLE, a clonal expression biomarker associated with survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.Nature cancer · 2025Article
- Rigid Tissue Increases Cytoplasmic pYAP Expression in Pre-Malignant Stage of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) In Vivo.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Article
- Evaluating the Prognostic and Therapeutic Potentials of the Proteasome 26S Subunit, ATPase (Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Evolutionary metabolic landscape from preneoplasia to invasive lung adenocarcinoma.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Independent prognostic implications ofJournal of Cancer · 2020Article
- Independent Prognostic Potential of GNPNAT1 in Lung Adenocarcinoma.BioMed research international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.