Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31278099›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Helping people discontinue long-term antidepressants: views of health professionals in UK primary care.

Hannah M Bowers, Samantha J Williams, Adam W A Geraghty, Emma Maund, Wendy O'brien, Geraldine Leydon, Carl R May, Tony Kendrick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah M BowersPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1996-6652
Samantha J WilliamsPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Adam W A GeraghtyPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Emma MaundPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.
Wendy O'brienPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.
Geraldine LeydonFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Carl R MayFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Tony KendrickPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1214-20004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aims of this paper were to identify, characterise and explain clinician factors that shape decision-making around antidepressant discontinuation in UK primary care.

designFour focus groups and three interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis.

participantsTwenty-one general practitioners (GPs), four GP assistants, seven nurses and six community mental health team workers and psychotherapists took part in focus groups and interviews.

settingParticipants were recruited from seven primary care regions and two National Health Service Trusts providing community mental health services in the South of England.

resultsParticipants highlighted a number of barriers and enablers to discussing discontinuation with patients. They held a range of views around responsibility, with some suggesting it was the responsibility of the health professional (HP) to broach the subject, and others suggesting responsibility rested with the patients. HPs were concerned about destabilising the current situation, discussed how continuity and knowing the patient facilitated discontinuation talks, and discussed how confidence in their professional skills and knowledge affected whether they elected to raise discontinuation in consultations.

conclusionsFindings indicate a need to consider support for HPs in the management of antidepressant medication and discussions of discontinuation in particular. They may also benefit from support around their fears of patient relapse and awareness of when and how to initiate discussions about discontinuation with their patients.

Indexed as

General PracticeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePrimary Health CareAntidepressive AgentsDepressive DisorderDrug Administration ScheduleEnglandFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchAntidepressive Agentsantidepressantshealth professionalprimary care

Identifiers

PMID31278099
PMCPMC6615882
OpenAlexW2955480450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.