Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31278003›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2019

Tension- and Adhesion-Regulated Retraction of Injured Axons.

Xueying Shao, Ran You, Tsz Hin Hui, Chao Fang, Ze Gong, Zishen Yan, Raymond Chuen Chung Chang, Vivek B Shenoy, Yuan Lin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xueying ShaoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; HKU-Shenzhen Institute of Research and Innovation, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Ran YouLaboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases, School of Biomedical Sciences, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Tsz Hin HuiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; HKU-Shenzhen Institute of Research and Innovation, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Chao FangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; HKU-Shenzhen Institute of Research and Innovation, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Ze GongCenter for Engineering Mechanobiology and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Zishen YanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; HKU-Shenzhen Institute of Research and Innovation, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Raymond Chuen Chung ChangLaboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases, School of Biomedical Sciences, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Vivek B ShenoyCenter for Engineering Mechanobiology and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: vshenoy@seas.upenn.edu.
Yuan LinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; HKU-Shenzhen Institute of Research and Innovation, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. Electronic address: ylin@hku.hk.
University of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Uncovering mechanical mechanisms of traumatic axonal injuryR01EB021293 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHENOY, VIVEK, SMITH, DOUGLAS HAMILTON · 2016 to 2019
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damage-induced retraction of axons during traumatic brain injury is believed to play a key role in the disintegration of the neural network and to eventually lead to severe symptoms such as permanent memory loss and emotional disturbances. However, fundamental questions such as how axon retraction progresses and what physical factors govern this process still remain unclear. Here, we report a combined experimental and modeling study to address these questions. Specifically, a sharp atomic force microscope probe was used to transect axons and trigger their retraction in a precisely controlled manner. Interestingly, we showed that the retracting motion of a well-developed axon can be arrested by strong cell-substrate attachment. However, axon retraction was found to be retriggered if a second transection was conducted, albeit with a lower shrinking amplitude. Furthermore, disruption of the actin cytoskeleton or cell-substrate adhesion significantly altered the retracting dynamics of injured axons. Finally, a mathematical model was developed to explain the observed injury response of neural cells in which the retracting motion was assumed to be driven by the pre-tension in the axon and progress against neuron-substrate adhesion as well as the viscous resistance of the cell. Using realistic parameters, model predictions were found to be in good agreement with our observations under a variety of experimental conditions. By revealing the essential physics behind traumatic axon retraction, findings here could provide insights on the development of treatment strategies for axonal injury as well as its possible interplay with other neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonAdhesivenessAnimalsAxonsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell AdhesionModels, NeurologicalRats, Sprague-DawleyTime-Lapse Imaging

Identifiers

PMID31278003
PMCPMC6702139
OpenAlexW2953103812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.