ArticleSchizophrenia research2020
CRISPR-based functional evaluation of schizophrenia risk variants.
Article in Schizophrenia research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating CRISPR functional genomics with admixture-aware psychotropic pharmacogenetics in Brazil.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Modeling common and rare genetic risk factors of neuropsychiatric disorders in human induced pluripotent stem cells.Schizophrenia research · 2024Review
- The Roles of hnRNP Family in the Brain and Brain-Related Disorders.Molecular neurobiology · 2024Review
- Publicly Available hiPSC Lines with Extreme Polygenic Risk Scores for Modeling Schizophrenia.Complex psychiatry · 2021Article
- Investigation of de novo mutations in a schizophrenia case-parent trio by induced pluripotent stem cell-based in vitro disease modeling: convergence of schizophrenia- and autism-related cellular phenotypes.Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
As expanding genetic and genomic studies continue to implicate a growing list of variants contributing risk to neuropsychiatric disease, an important next step is to understand the functional impact and points of convergence of these risk factors. Here, with a focus on schizophrenia, we survey the most recent findings of the rare and common variants underlying genetic risk for schizophrenia. We discuss the ongoing efforts to validate these variants in post-mortem brain tissue, as well as new approaches to combine CRISPR-based genome engineering with patient-specific human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-based models, in order to identify putative causal schizophrenia loci that regulate gene expression and cellular function. We consider the current limitations of hiPSC-based approaches as well as the future advances necessary to improve the fidelity of this human model. With the objective of utilizing patient genotype data to improve diagnosis and predict treatment response, the integration of CRISPR-genome engineering and hiPSC-based models represent an important strategy with which to systematically demonstrate the cell-type-specific effects of schizophrenia-associated variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.