ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2019
Social and demographic characteristics of a Polish cohort with Wilson disease and the impact of treatment persistence.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of neurological symptoms and associated factors in patients with Wilson's disease in Southwest China.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- N,N'-bis(2-mercaptoethyl)isophthalamide (NBMI) as a novel chelator for Wilson's disease.Free radical biology & medicine · 2025Article
- Psychiatric Presentation of Wilson's Disease: A Rare Disease With an Unusual Manifestation.Cureus · 2025Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Living with Wilson Disease in Spain: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- "Because it is a rare disease…it needs to be brought to attention that there are things out of the norm": a qualitative study of patient and physician experiences of Wilson disease diagnosis and management in the US.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Two Salts of Trientine in the Treatment of Wilson's Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical and Genetic Analysis in Neurological Wilson's Disease Patients With Neurological Worsening Following Chelator Therapy.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Persistence with medical treatment for Wilson disease in China based on a single center's survey research.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
- Persistence with treatment for Wilson disease: a retrospective study.BMC neurology · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWilson disease (WD) is a genetic disorder involving impaired copper metabolism, which presents with hepatic, neurological, and/or psychiatric manifestations. WD requires lifelong pharmacotherapy and treatment persistence may be problematic. We studied social characteristics, education, and work-related activities and how they are affected by WD symptoms and treatment persistence.
methodsIn a cross-sectional study, data on demographic characteristics, achieved education level, household and marital status, plus a primary source of income were collected from 202 Polish subjects (mean ± standard deviation age of 36.4 ± 9.9 years at assessment) with WD.
resultsOverall, WD appeared to have a negative impact on achieved level of education and influenced the ability to work as compared with the general Polish population. Patients with neurological manifestations less often achieved upper-secondary/post-secondary or higher education compared with those with hepatic manifestations (65.5% vs. 83.6%; p = 0.003). They also significantly less frequently stated salary (19.6% vs. 56.2%; p < 0.0001) as the primary income and more often were on disability pension (53.3% vs. 26.0%; p = 0.0003). The percentage of married patients with WD appeared lower than in the general population (47.0% vs. 54.6%), although the difference was not significant (p = 0.2). The 27.6% of patients who were non-persistent with WD treatment less frequently achieved upper/post-secondary or higher education compared with persistent patients (66.0% vs. 76.3%; NS) and their primary source of outcome was significantly less often a salary (18.9% vs. 40.3%; p = 0.001).
conclusionsNeurological manifestations had an adverse effect on education level and work ability. Treatment non-persistence had a further negative impact regardless of the disease form. Patients with WD should receive appropriate treatment, with the need for persistence emphasized and monitored to avoid a detrimental effect on their lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.