Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31277669›Full record

ReviewAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2019

CRISPR-cas system: biological function in microbes and its use to treat antimicrobial resistant pathogens.

Muhammad Abu Bakr Shabbir, Muhammad Zubair Shabbir, Qin Wu, Sammina Mahmood, Abdul Sajid, Muhammad Kashif Maan, Saeed Ahmed, Umer Naveed, Haihong Hao, Zonghui Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The H-NS homologues MvaT and MvaU repress CRISPR-Cas inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Population and pan-genomic analyses ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Muhammad Abu Bakr ShabbirChina MOA Laboratory for Risk Assessment of Quality and Safety of Livestock and Poultry Products, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Muhammad Zubair ShabbirQuality Operation Laboratory at University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, 54600, Pakistan.
Qin WuNational Reference Laboratory of Veterinary Drug Residues and MOA Key Laboratory for the Detection of Veterinary Drug Residues in Foods, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Sammina MahmoodDepartment of Botany, University of Education, Bank Road Campus, Lahore, Pakistan.
Abdul SajidChina MOA Laboratory for Risk Assessment of Quality and Safety of Livestock and Poultry Products, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Muhammad Kashif MaanChina MOA Laboratory for Risk Assessment of Quality and Safety of Livestock and Poultry Products, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Saeed AhmedChina MOA Laboratory for Risk Assessment of Quality and Safety of Livestock and Poultry Products, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Umer NaveedThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Haihong HaoChina MOA Laboratory for Risk Assessment of Quality and Safety of Livestock and Poultry Products, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China. haohaihong@mail.hzau.edu.cn.
Zonghui YuanChina MOA Laboratory for Risk Assessment of Quality and Safety of Livestock and Poultry Products, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China. Yuan5802@mail.hzau.edu.cn.
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNAbdul Wali Khan University Mardan · PKRoslin Institute · GBUniversity of Education · PKUniversity of Veterinary and Animal Sciences · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria is a major public health threat. Infection rates of resistant pathogens continue to rise against nearly all antimicrobials, which has led to development of different strategies to combat the antimicrobial resistance. In this review, we discuss how the newly popular CRISPR-cas system has been applied to combat antibiotic resistance in both extracellular and intracellular pathogens. We also review a recently developed method in which nano-size CRISPR complex was used without any phage to target the mecA gene. However, there is still challenge to practice these methods in field against emerging antimicrobial resistant pathogens.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDrug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaGene EditingAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibacterialsAntimicrobial resistanceCas9CRISPR-cas systemIntracellular infection

Identifiers

PMID31277669
PMCPMC6611046
OpenAlexW2955774496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.