ArticleBMC health services research2019
Characterization of high healthcare utilizer groups using administrative data from an electronic medical record database.
Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Use of general practitioner services among high-cost older patients in somatic hospitals - a Norwegian registry-based study.BMC health services research · 2026Observational
- Predictors of depression outcomes among university students following brief smartphone-based interventions.Npj mental health research · 2026Article
- Ensemble Machine Learning Models for Predicting Patients With High Usage: Model Validation and Economic Impact Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Municipal healthcare providers' perceptions of reasons for frequent and unplanned hospital admissions among home-dwelling older adults: a Norwegian focus group study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Individualized Care Plans for High Utilizers.Journal of Brown hospital medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Multimorbidity in middle-aged women and COVID-19: binary data clustering for unsupervised binning of rare multimorbidity features and predictive modeling.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Article
- Characterizing hospitalization trajectories in the high-need, high-cost population using electronic health record data.Health affairs scholar · 2023Article
- Older high-cost patients in Norwegian somatic hospitals: a register-based study of patient characteristics.BMJ open · 2023Observational
- Development and validation of a tool to predict high-need, high-cost patients hospitalised with ischaemic heart disease.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Characteristics of High-Resource Health System Users in Rural and Remote Regions: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Differential Impact of a Plan-Led Standardized Complex Care Management Intervention on Subgroups of High-Cost High-Need Medicaid Patients.Population health management · 2023Article
- The UCLA ATLAS Community Health Initiative: Promoting precision health research in a diverse biobank.Cell genomics · 2023Article
- Novel integration of governmental data sources using machine learning to identify super-utilization among U.S. counties.Intelligence-based medicine · 2023Article
- Prediction and analysis of time series data based on granular computing.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh utilizers (HUs) are a small group of patients who impose a disproportionately high burden on the healthcare system due to their elevated resource use. Identification of persistent HUs is pertinent as interventions have not been effective due to regression to the mean in majority of patients. This study will use cost and utilization metrics to segment a hospital-based patient population into HU groups.
methodsThe index visit for each adult patient to an Academic Medical Centre in Singapore during 2006 to 2012 was identified. Cost, length of stay (LOS) and number of specialist outpatient clinic (SOC) visits within 1 year following the index visit were extracted and aggregated. Patients were HUs if they exceeded the 90th percentile of any metric, and Non-HU otherwise. Seven different HU groups and a Non-HU group were constructed. The groups were described in terms of cost and utilization patterns, socio-demographic information, multi-morbidity scores and medical history. Logistic regression compared the groups' persistence as a HU in any group into the subsequent year, adjusting for socio-demographic information and diagnosis history.
resultsA total of 388,162 patients above the age of 21 were included in the study. Cost-LOS-SOC HUs had the highest multi-morbidity and persistence into the second year. Common conditions among Cost-LOS and Cost-LOS-SOC HUs were cardiovascular disease, acute cerebrovascular disease and pneumonia, while most LOS and LOS-SOC HUs were diagnosed with at least one mental health condition. Regression analyses revealed that HUs across all groups were more likely to persist compared to Non-HUs, with stronger relationships seen in groups with high SOC utilization. Similar trends remained after further adjustment.
conclusionHUs of healthcare services are a diverse group and can be further segmented into different subgroups based on cost and utilization patterns. Segmentation by these metrics revealed differences in socio-demographic characteristics, disease profile and persistence. Most HUs did not persist in their high utilization, and high SOC users should be prioritized for further longitudinal analyses. Segmentation will enable policy makers to better identify the diverse needs of patients, detect gaps in current care and focus their efforts in delivering care relevant and tailored to each segment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.