Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31277596›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Grand multiparity in rural Cameroon: prevalence and adverse maternal and fetal delivery outcomes.

Atem Bethel Ajong, Valirie Ndip Agbor, Larissa Pone Simo, Jean Jacques Noubiap, Tsi Njim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Atem Bethel AjongMaternity and Surgical Department, Kekem District Hospital, Kekem, Cameroon.
Valirie Ndip AgborIbal Sub-divisional hospital, Oku, Northwest Region, Cameroon. nvagbor@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6708-6852
Larissa Pone SimoFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Bamenda, Bamenda, Cameroon.
Jean Jacques NoubiapDepartment of Medicine, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Tsi NjimCape Universities Body Imaging Center, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
University of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Bamenda · CMUniversity of Douala · CM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrand multiparity is a major public health concern especially among developing countries and has been associated with higher risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes compared with women of lesser parity. There is a dearth of evidence on this subject in Cameroon, especially in the rural areas. We therefore carried out this study to document the prevalence and maternal and fetal delivery outcomes of grand multiparity in a rural Cameroonian setting.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of delivery records from two health facilities (the Oku District Hospital and Kevu Integrated Health Centre) in the Oku Health District over a period of eight years. Data was entered into and analyzed using Epi-Info version 7.0.8.3. The Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. The threshold of statistical significance was set at 5%.

resultsA total of 1755 delivery records met our inclusion criteria. The overall prevalence of grand multiparity was 27.0%. We found no significant difference in the rate of selected maternal and fetal delivery outcomes between grand multiparous women and those with lesser parity (p-value> 0.05). However, grand multiparous women were less likely to develop second-fourth degree perineal tears compared to their counterparts with lesser parity (odds ratio = 0.3, 95% confidence interval = 0.2-0.7, p = 0.001).

conclusionOur study depicts a high prevalence of grand multiparous delivery in this rural community. With the exception of severe perineal tear, grand multipara and their babies are as likely to develop adverse delivery outcomes as their counterparts with lesser parity. There is also the need to enhance existing government policies on reproductive health in rural areas.

Indexed as

ParityAdolescentAdultCameroonFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMaternal HealthMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsDelivery outcomesGrand multiparityRural Cameroon

Identifiers

PMID31277596
PMCPMC6612095
OpenAlexW2955277585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.