Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31277573›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Comparative genome analysis of Phyllosticta citricarpa and Phyllosticta capitalensis, two fungi species that share the same host.

Carolina Munari Rodrigues, Marco Aurélio Takita, Nicholas Vinicius Silva, Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves, Marcos Antonio Machado

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic Characteristics and Comparative Genomics Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Genomic Sequencing ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carolina Munari RodriguesLaboratório de Biotecnologia, Centro APTA Citros Sylvio Moreira, CP4, Cordeirópolis, SP, 13490-970, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio TakitaLaboratório de Biotecnologia, Centro APTA Citros Sylvio Moreira, CP4, Cordeirópolis, SP, 13490-970, Brazil.
Nicholas Vinicius SilvaLaboratório de Genômica e BioEnergia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Marcelo Ribeiro-AlvesLaboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em DST/AIDS, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040900, Brazil.
Marcos Antonio MachadoLaboratório de Biotecnologia, Centro APTA Citros Sylvio Moreira, CP4, Cordeirópolis, SP, 13490-970, Brazil. marcos@ccsm.br.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

CAPES 001CNPq 465440/2014-2Fapesp 2014/19375-7Fapesp 2014/50880-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCitrus are among the most important crops in the world. However, there are many diseases that affect Citrus caused by different pathogens. Citrus also hosts many symbiotic microorganisms in a relationship that may be advantageous for both organisms. The fungi Phyllosticta citricarpa, responsible for citrus black spot, and Phyllosticta capitalensis, an endophytic species, are examples of closely related species with different behavior in citrus. Both species are always biologically associated and are morphologically very similar, and comparing their genomes could help understanding the different lifestyles. In this study, a comparison was carried to identify genetic differences that could help us to understand the biology of P. citricarpa and P. capitalensis.

resultsDrafts genomes were assembled with sizes close to 33 Mb for both fungi, carrying 15,206 and 14,797 coding sequences for P. citricarpa and P. capitalensis, respectively. Even though the functional categories of these coding sequences is similar, enrichment analysis showed that the pathogenic species presents growth and development genes that may be necessary for the pathogenicity of P. citricarpa. On the other hand, family expansion analyses showed the plasticity of the genome of these species. Particular families are expanded in the genome of an ancestor of P. capitalensis and a recent expansion can also be detected among this species. Additionally, evolution could be driven by environmental cues in P. citricarpa.

conclusionsThis work demonstrated genomic differences between P. citricarpa and P. capitalensis. Although the idea that these differences could explain the different lifestyles of these fungi, we were not able to confirm this hypothesis. Genome evolution seems to be of real importance among the Phyllosticta isolates and it is leading to different biological characteristics of these species.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantPhylogenyAscomycotaCitrusEndophytesEnzymesFungal ProteinsGenomicsHost-Pathogen InteractionsPlant DiseasesEnzymesFungal ProteinsCitrus black spotEndophytic speciesFunctional enrichment analysisGene family expansionPathogenic speciesPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID31277573
PMCPMC6612112
OpenAlexW2956045415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.