Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31277567›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

QTL-mapping and genomic prediction for bovine respiratory disease in U.S. Holsteins using sequence imputation and feature selection.

Jesse L Hoff, Jared E Decker, Robert D Schnabel, Christopher M Seabury, Holly L Neibergs, Jeremy F Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic Study ofFrontiers in immunology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jesse L HoffDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Jared E DeckerDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Robert D SchnabelDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Christopher M SeaburyDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Holly L NeibergsDepartment of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99163, USA.
Jeremy F TaylorDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. taylorjerr@missouri.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6997-7245
University of Missouri · USTexas A&M University · USWashington State University · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2011-68004-30367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational genetic evaluations for disease resistance do not exist, precluding the genetic improvement of cattle for these traits. We imputed BovineHD genotypes to whole genome sequence for 2703 Holsteins that were cases or controls for Bovine Respiratory Disease and sampled from either California or New Mexico to construct and compare genomic prediction models. The sequence variation reference dataset comprised variants called for 1578 animals from Run 5 of the 1000 Bull Genomes Project, including 450 Holsteins and 29 animals sequenced from this study population. Genotypes for 9,282,726 variants with minor allele frequencies ≥5% were imputed and used to obtain genomic predictions in GEMMA using a Bayesian Sparse Linear Mixed Model.

resultsVariation explained by markers increased from 13.6% using BovineHD data to 14.4% using imputed whole genome sequence data and the resolution of genomic regions detected as harbouring QTL substantially increased. Explained variation in the analysis of the combined California and New Mexico data was less than when data for each state were separately analysed and the estimated genetic correlation between risk of Bovine Respiratory Disease in California and New Mexico Holsteins was - 0.36. Consequently, genomic predictions trained using the data from one state did not accurately predict disease risk in the other state. To determine if a prediction model could be developed with utility in both states, we selected variants within genomic regions harbouring: 1) genes involved in the normal immune response to infection by pathogens responsible for Bovine Respiratory Disease detected by RNA-Seq analysis, and/or 2) QTL identified in the association analysis of the imputed sequence variants. The model based on QTL selected variants is biased but when trained in one state generated BRD risk predictions with positive accuracies in the other state.

conclusionsWe demonstrate the utility of sequence-based and biology-driven model development for genomic selection. Disease phenotypes cannot be routinely recorded in most livestock species and the observed phenotypes may vary in their genomic architecture due to variation in the pathogen composition across environments. Elucidation of trait biology and genetic architecture may guide the development of prediction models with utility across breeds and environments.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait LociAnimalsBayes TheoremBovine Respiratory Disease ComplexCaliforniaCase-Control StudiesCattleGene FrequencyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticNew MexicoReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, RNAWhole Genome SequencingBovine respiratory diseaseFeature selectionGenome sequence imputationGenomic predictionQuantitative trait locusRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID31277567
PMCPMC6612181
OpenAlexW2953996177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.