Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31277368›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Comparison of Sugar Profile between Leaves and Fruits of Blueberry and Strawberry Cultivars Grown in Organic and Integrated Production System.

Milica Fotirić Akšić, Tomislav Tosti, Milica Sredojević, Jasminka Milivojević, Mekjell Meland, Maja Natić

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Physiological and Metabolic Responses of Wheat (ACS agricultural science & technology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Metabolic Profile of Leaves and Pulp ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Milica Fotirić AkšićFaculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia. fotiric@agrif.bg.ac.rs.
Tomislav TostiFaculty of Chemistry, University of Belgrade, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-1403-4688
Milica SredojevićInnovation Center, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Belgrade, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-9039-3201
Jasminka MilivojevićFaculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia.
Mekjell MelandNorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research-NIBIO Ullensvang, 5781 Lofthus, Norway.
Maja NatićFaculty of Chemistry, University of Belgrade, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia.
University of Belgrade · RSNorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine and compare the sugar profile, distribution in fruits and leaves and sink-source relationship in three strawberry ('Favette', 'Alba' and 'Clery') and three blueberry cultivars ('Bluecrop', 'Duke' and 'Nui') grown in organic (OP) and integrated production systems (IP). Sugar analysis was done using high-performance anion-exchange chromatography (HPAEC) with pulsed amperometric detection (PAD). The results showed that monosaccharide glucose and fructose and disaccharide sucrose were the most important sugars in strawberry, while monosaccharide glucose, fructose, and galactose were the most important in blueberry. Source-sink relationship was different in strawberry compared to blueberry, having a much higher quantity of sugars in its fruits in relation to leaves. According to principal component analysis (PCA), galactose, arabinose, and melibiose were the most important sugars in separating the fruits of strawberries from blueberries, while panose, ribose, stachyose, galactose, maltose, rhamnose, and raffinose were the most important sugar component in leaves recognition. Galactitol, melibiose, and gentiobiose were the key sugars that split out strawberry fruits and leaves, while galactose, maltotriose, raffinose, fructose, and glucose divided blueberry fruits and leaves in two groups. PCA was difficult to distinguish between OP and IP, because the stress-specific responses of the studied plants were highly variable due to the different sensitivity levels and defense strategies of each cultivar, which directly affected the sugar distribution. Due to its high content of sugars, especially fructose, the strawberry cultivar 'Clery' and the blueberry cultivars 'Bluecrop' and 'Nui' could be singled out in this study as being the most suitable cultivars for OP.

Indexed as

carbohydratesFragaria × ananassafructosegalactoseHPAEC-PADprincipal component analysisVaccinium corymbosum

Identifiers

PMID31277368
PMCPMC6681319
OpenAlexW2955086695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.