Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31276451›Full record

ArticleJournal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society

Examining Prevalence and Risk Factors of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Using the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey.

Susan A Kayser, LeeAnn Phipps, Catherine A VanGilder, Charlie Lachenbruch

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06613503 (Testing the Effectiveness of the AI-Supporter in Reducing Urinary Tract Infections, Incontinence-associated Dermatitis and Caregiving Costs for Incontinence Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06613503 narecruitingnot on this map

Testing the Effectiveness of the AI-Supporter in Reducing Urinary Tract Infections, Incontinence-associated Dermatitis and Caregiving Costs for Incontinence Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorChina Medical University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsIncontinence, Urinary Tract Infection, Incontinence-associated Dermatitis, Cost-effectivenessArmsAI-supporter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Applying natural language processing to understand symptoms among older adult home healthcare patients with urinary incontinence.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nurses' Knowledge Regarding Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan A KayserSusan A. Kayser, PhD, Hillrom, Batesville, Indiana. LeeAnn Phipps, PhD, Hillrom, Batesville, Indiana. Catherine A. VanGilder, MBA, BS, MT, CCRA, Hillrom, Batesville, Indiana. Charlie Lachenbruch, PhD, Hillrom, Batesville, Indiana.
LeeAnn Phipps
Catherine A VanGilder
Charlie Lachenbruch
Creative Commons · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate prevalence and risk factors of incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD).

designRetrospective analysis of 2016 International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence survey data. SUBJECTS AND

settingAdult patients who were in acute care, long-term acute care, long-term care, and rehabilitation facilities in the United States and Canada.

methodsIAD prevalence was calculated among all patients surveyed, among the incontinent patients only, across multiple care settings, and by incontinence type. A logistic regression examined risk factors for IAD in the incontinent population.

resultsNearly 1 in 5 incontinent patients had IAD documented. Incontinence-associated dermatitis prevalence in the entire patient population was 4.3% while incontinence prevalence was 18%. Of incontinent patients, prevalence of IAD ranged from 8.4% in long-term care facilities to 19% in acute care facilities. Facilities with higher rates of incontinence did not necessarily have higher prevalence of IAD. Incontinence-associated dermatitis prevalence by incontinence type ranged from 12% for patients with urinary incontinence to 26% for patients with fecal management systems. Regression results support the association of the following factors with an increased likelihood of IAD documented: all types of incontinence, fecal management systems, higher body weight, diminished mobility, additional linen layers, longer length of stay, and lower Braden Scale scores.

conclusionsIncontinence-associated dermatitis remains a concern in acute care settings. Risk factors associated with IAD were similar to risk factors previously reported for hospital-acquired pressure injuries, such as limited mobility, longer lengths of stay, and additional linen layers. By consistently documenting IAD as well as pressure injury prevalence, facilities may benchmark overall skin prevention models.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCanadaDermatitisFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLong-Term CareMaleMiddle AgedPressure UlcerPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31276451
PMCPMC6716554
OpenAlexW2957349427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.