ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2019
Difference in the artefacts production and the performance of the metal artefact reduction (MAR) tool between the buccal and lingual cortical plates adjacent to zirconium dental implant.
Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of bone repair with platelet-rich fibrin following the extraction of impacted third molars - randomized clinical trial.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2023Trial
- Ex Vivo Quantitative Evaluation of Beam Hardening Artifacts at Various Implant Locations in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Using Metal Artifact Reduction and Noise Reduction Techniques.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Impact of Combined Deep Learning Image Reconstruction and Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm on CT Image Quality in Different Scanning Conditions for Maxillofacial Region with Metal Implants: A Phantom Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of milliamperage on cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bone grafts around dental implants.Imaging science in dentistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of the spatial orientation of the patient's head, metal artifact reduction, and tube current on cone-beam computed tomography artifact expression adjacent to a dental implant: A laboratory study using a simulated surgical guide.Imaging science in dentistry · 2024Article
- The Effect of Changes in the Angular Position of Implants on Metal Artifact Reduction in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images: A Scoping Review.Radiology research and practice · 2023Article
- Comparison of the amount of artifacts induced by zirconium and titanium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
- Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants.Imaging science in dentistry · 2022Article
- Influence of artefacts generated by titanium and zirconium implants in the study of trabecular bone architecture in cone-beam CT images.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2022Article
- The Impact of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Exposure Parameters on Peri-Implant Artifacts: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2022Review
- Do the number of basis images and metal artifact reduction affect the production of artifacts near and far from zirconium dental implants in CBCT?Clinical oral investigations · 2021Article
- Do the tube current and metal artifact reduction influence the diagnosis of vertical root fracture in a tooth positioned in the vicinity of a zirconium implant? A CBCT study.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Article
- Does the metal artifact reduction algorithm activation mode influence the magnitude of artifacts in CBCT images?Imaging science in dentistry · 2020Article
- Magnitude of beam-hardening artifacts produced by gutta-percha and metal posts on cone-beam computed tomography with varying tube current.Imaging science in dentistry · 2020Article
- The metal post material influences the performance of artefact reduction algorithms in CBCT images.Brazilian dental journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo quantify the artefacts production and the performance of the metal artefact reduction (MAR) tool, enabled before or after the acquisition, in cortical plates (buccal and lingual) and other regions adjacent to zirconium implants.
methodsCone beam CT scans were acquired using the OP300 Maxio unit before (control group) and after (implant group) the insertion of a zirconium implant into the posterior region of a dry mandible. Three conditions of MAR tool were tested: "without MAR", with "MAR activated after acquisition", and with "MAR activated before acquisition". The standard deviation (SD), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and voxel values were calculated in the buccal and lingual cortical plates, medullary bone and water region, close to the implant. The structural bone analysis was performed in the medullary bone close to the implant.
resultsOverall, in control and implant groups, the lingual cortical had higher SD, lower CNR and lower voxel values than the buccal cortical, regardless of the MAR condition (
conclusionThe expression of artefacts adjacent to zirconium implants is greater in the lingual than in the buccal cortical. The greater the expression of artefacts in this region, the greater the effectiveness of the MAR tool in homogenizing the grey values, regardless of the time of its activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.