ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2019
Type 1 diabetes genetic risk score discriminates between monogenic and Type 1 diabetes in children diagnosed at the age of <5 years in the Iranian population.
Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Polygenic Risk Scores for Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of parental autoimmune diseases on type 1 diabetes in offspring can be partially explained by HLA and non-HLA polymorphisms.Cell genomics · 2025Article
- Type 1 Diabetes Genetic Risk Scores: History, Application and Future Directions.Current diabetes reports · 2025Review
- Identifying genetically predisposed type 1 diabetes mellitus individuals in a Southern Brazilian population: The construction of a genetic risk score.Genetics and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Genetic research in Immunogenetics Group of Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2024Review
- The use of precision diagnostics for monogenic diabetes: a systematic review and expert opinion.Communications medicine · 2023Article
- Utility of genetic risk scores in type 1 diabetes.Diabetologia · 2023Review
- How do I diagnose Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young in my patients?Clinical endocrinology · 2022Review
- Type 1 diabetes in diverse ancestries and the use of genetic risk scores.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2022Review
- Syndromic Monogenic Diabetes Genes Should Be Tested in Patients With a Clinical Suspicion of Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young.Diabetes · 2022Article
- The importance of increasing population diversity in genetic studies of type 2 diabetes and related glycaemic traits.Diabetologia · 2021Review
- Different interaction of onset age and duration of type 1 diabetes on the dynamics of autoantibodies to insulinoma-associated antigen-2 and zinc transporter 8.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2021Article
- Type 1 diabetes genetic risk score discriminates between monogenic and Type 1 diabetes in children diagnosed at the age of <5 years in the Iranian population.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo examine the extent to which discriminatory testing using antibodies and Type 1 diabetes genetic risk score, validated in European populations, is applicable in a non-European population.
methodsWe recruited 127 unrelated children with diabetes diagnosed between 9 months and 5 years from two centres in Iran. All children underwent targeted next-generation sequencing of 35 monogenic diabetes genes. We measured three islet autoantibodies (islet antigen 2, glutamic acid decarboxylase and zinc transporter 8) and generated a Type 1 diabetes genetic risk score in all children.
resultsWe identified six children with monogenic diabetes, including four novel mutations: homozygous mutations in WFS1 (n=3), SLC19A2 and SLC29A3, and a heterozygous mutation in GCK. All clinical features were similar in children with monogenic diabetes (n=6) and in the rest of the cohort (n=121). The Type 1 diabetes genetic risk score discriminated children with monogenic from Type 1 diabetes [area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.90 (95% CI 0.83-0.97)]. All children with monogenic diabetes were autoantibody-negative. In children with no mutation, 59 were positive to glutamic acid decarboxylase, 39 to islet antigen 2 and 31 to zinc transporter 8. Measuring zinc transporter 8 increased the number of autoantibody-positive individuals by eight.
conclusionsThe present study provides the first evidence that Type 1 diabetes genetic risk score can be used to distinguish monogenic from Type 1 diabetes in an Iranian population with a large number of consanguineous unions. This test can be used to identify children with a higher probability of having monogenic diabetes who could then undergo genetic testing. Identification of these individuals would reduce the cost of treatment and improve the management of their clinical course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.