Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31276160›Full record

ReviewEndocrine reviews2019

Realizing a Closed-Loop (Artificial Pancreas) System for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes.

Rayhan A Lal, Laya Ekhlaspour, Korey Hood, Bruce Buckingham

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Use with the MiniMedDiabetes technology & therapeutics · 2021
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rayhan A LalDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Laya EkhlaspourDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Korey HoodDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Bruce BuckinghamDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Clinical Acceptance of the Artificial Pancreas: the International Diabetes Closed Loop (iDCL) TrialUC4DK108483 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI ANDERSON, STACEY, DOYLE, FRANCIS J · 2016 to 2016
$12.7M
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Training GrantT32DK007217 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Justin Pierce Annes, David Matthew Maahs · 1987 to 2026
$7.2M
One year day-and-night home closed loop in young people with type 1 diabetesUC4DK108520 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE · PI BERGENSTAL, RICHARD MAURITZ, BUCKINGHAM, BRUCE A · 2015 to 2015
$6.3M
Network Control of Diabetes: Aligning Artificial Pancreas Design with PhysiologyDP3DK101055 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI KOVATCHEV, BORIS P · 2013 to 2013
$3.4M
Using a Closed-Loop System Plus Behavioral Supports in Preschoolers with DiabetesDP3DK104059 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BUCKINGHAM, BRUCE A, DIMEGLIO, LINDA A · 2014 to 2014
$2.1M
Training Research Leaders in Type 1 DiabetesK12DK122550 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MAAHS, DAVID MATTHEW · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS DP3 DK101055NIDDK NIH HHS DP3 DK104059NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK122550NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007217NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK108483NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK108520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent, rapid changes in the treatment of type 1 diabetes have allowed for commercialization of an "artificial pancreas" that is better described as a closed-loop controller of insulin delivery. This review presents the current state of closed-loop control systems and expected future developments with a discussion of the human factor issues in allowing automation of glucose control. The goal of these systems is to minimize or prevent both short-term and long-term complications from diabetes and to decrease the daily burden of managing diabetes. The closed-loop systems are generally very effective and safe at night, have allowed for improved sleep, and have decreased the burden of diabetes management overnight. However, there are still significant barriers to achieving excellent daytime glucose control while simultaneously decreasing the burden of daytime diabetes management. These systems use a subcutaneous continuous glucose sensor, an algorithm that accounts for the current glucose and rate of change of the glucose, and the amount of insulin that has already been delivered to safely deliver insulin to control hyperglycemia, while minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia. The future challenge will be to allow for full closed-loop control with minimal burden on the patient during the day, alleviating meal announcements, carbohydrate counting, alerts, and maintenance. The human factors involved with interfacing with a closed-loop system and allowing the system to take control of diabetes management are significant. It is important to find a balance between enthusiasm and realistic expectations and experiences with the closed-loop system.

Indexed as

Insulin Infusion SystemsPancreas, ArtificialAutomationDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID31276160
PMCPMC6821212
OpenAlexW2955714219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.