Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31276025›Full record

ArticleUrology practice2019

Patient and Provider Variables Associated with Variation in the Systemic Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Megan E V Caram, Shikun Wang, Phoebe Tsao, Jennifer J Griggs, David C Miller, Brent K Hollenbeck, Paul Lin, Bhramar Mukherjee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Improving outcomes of patients with advanced prostate cancer through a better understanding of clinical factors contributing to financial toxicity: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Megan E V CaramDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School.
Shikun WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan.
Phoebe TsaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School.
Jennifer J GriggsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School.
David C MillerDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School.
Brent K HollenbeckDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School.
Paul LinInstitute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan Medical School.
Bhramar MukherjeeDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USVA Center for Clinical Management Research · US

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Impact of urologist practice organization and health policy on prostate cancer treatment, overtreatment and spendingR01HS025707 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HOLLENBECK, BRENT K., SHAHINIAN, VAHAKN B · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS025707NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSix treatments have improved overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), each differing in toxicities and cost. This study identified patient and provider factors associated with variation in treatment of men with mCRPC to identify potential barriers to treatments.

methodsA claims database of commercially insured patients was used to identify patients with prostate cancer treated with abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, sipuleucel-T, or radium-223 between 2010 and 2016. Multinomial and binomial logistic regressions were conducted to determine patient and provider factors associated with treatment patterns.

resultsAmong 5,575 patients identified, patients with a household income >$99,000 were less likely to receive an expensive oral androgen signaling inhibitor (abiraterone or enzalutamide) as first-line treatment versus docetaxel compared to patients with a household income <$50,000 (odds ratio, OR, 0.66, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.48-0.92). Patients who are Black (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.02-2.01), live in the Pacific region versus the South Atlantic (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.74-4.11), received treatment from a urologist versus a medical oncologist (OR 16.05, 95% CI 6.01-42.86), or had pre-existing heart failure (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.42) were more likely to receive first-line oral androgen signaling inhibitors over docetaxel, independent of other factors on multivariable analysis.

conclusionClinicians and policy makers should be aware of the potential barriers and provider factors that influence use of novel therapies among patients with advanced prostate cancer, including the paradoxical effect of income and the substantial effect of provider specialty on first-line treatment rendered to patients with mCRPC.

Indexed as

care deliveryclaims datanovel agentsprostate cancervariation

Identifiers

PMID31276025
PMCPMC6605774
OpenAlexW2913185439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.