Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31275952›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2019

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta: Review of the Literature and Applications to Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care.

Guillaume L Hoareau, Emily M Tibbits, Carl A Beyer, Meryl A Simon, Erik S DeSoucy, E Robert Faulconer, Lucas P Neff, J Kevin Grayson, Ian J Stewart, Timothy K Williams and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Fluids of the Future.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Guillaume L HoareauClinical Investigation Facility, David Grant USAF Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, Travis, CA, United States.
Emily M TibbitsClinical Investigation Facility, David Grant USAF Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, Travis, CA, United States.
Carl A BeyerClinical Investigation Facility, David Grant USAF Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, Travis, CA, United States.
Meryl A SimonClinical Investigation Facility, David Grant USAF Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, Travis, CA, United States.
Erik S DeSoucyClinical Investigation Facility, David Grant USAF Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, Travis, CA, United States.
E Robert FaulconerVascular Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Lucas P NeffDepartment of Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
J Kevin GraysonClinical Investigation Facility, David Grant USAF Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, Travis, CA, United States.
Ian J StewartClinical Investigation Facility, David Grant USAF Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, Travis, CA, United States.
Timothy K WilliamsDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
M Austin JohnsonClinical Investigation Facility, David Grant USAF Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, Travis, CA, United States.
David Grant USAF Medical Center · USAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · USDerriford Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While hemorrhagic shock might be the result of various conditions, hemorrhage control and resuscitation are the corner stone of patient management. Hemorrhage control can prove challenging in both the acute care and surgical settings, especially in the abdomen, where no direct pressure can be applied onto the source of bleeding. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has emerged as a promising replacement to resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) for the management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage in human trauma patients. By inflating a balloon at specific levels (or zones) of the aorta to interrupt blood flow, hemorrhage below the level of the balloon can be controlled. While REBOA allows for hemorrhage control and augmentation of blood pressure cranial to the balloon, it also exposes caudal tissue beds to ischemia and the whole body to reperfusion injury. We aim to introduce the advantages of REBOA while reviewing known limitations. This review outlines a step-by-step approach to REBOA implementation, and discusses common challenges observed both in human patients and during translational large animal studies. Currently accepted and debated indications for REBOA in humans are discussed. Finally, we review possible applications for veterinary patients and how REBOA has the potential to be translated into clinical veterinary practice.

Indexed as

endovascular trauma managementhemorrhagenon-compressible truncal hemorrhageshocktrauma

Identifiers

PMID31275952
PMCPMC6594359
OpenAlexW2951498834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.