Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31275944›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2019

Cytokine Adsorption in Critically Ill Patients Requiring ECMO Support.

Achim Lother, Christoph Benk, Dawid L Staudacher, Alexander Supady, Christoph Bode, Tobias Wengenmayer, Daniel Duerschmied

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. CytoSorbBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Achim LotherDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christoph BenkDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Dawid L StaudacherDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Alexander SupadyDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christoph BodeDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Tobias WengenmayerDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Daniel DuerschmiedDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic inflammation is a key characteristic of sepsis but also also in non-infectious conditions such as post-cardiac arrest syndrome. Cytokine adsorption and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are emerging therapies applied in these critically ill patients, but the experience with their concurrent use is limited. We evaluated cytokine adsorption in critically ill patients requiring support with either veno-venous (vv) or veno-arterial (va) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support and hypothesized that adsorber incorporation into the ECMO circuit was technically feasible and not associated with imminent risk. We analyzed data from the first six cases of a prospective single-center registry of patients undergoing veno-venous (vv) or veno-arterial (va) ECMO therapy. While in most published cases cytokine adsorbers were inserted into a hemofiltration circuit, we directly incorporated the adsorber into the ECMO circuit without interruption of continuous ECMO support. We observed no relevant side effects attributable to cytokine adsorption. Thirty-day mortality was 83% (predicted mortality 87%), indicating that the decision for adding cytokine adsorption may have been considered as an ultima ratio decision in severe cases with poor prognosis. Vasopressor or inotrope use, lactate level, and fluid balance did not change significantly when comparing pre- vs. post-cytokine adsorption values. Interestingly, the real-time course of the mentioned three surrogate parameters remained unaltered in all but two cases, regardless of cytokine removal. Beneficial effects of cytokine adsorption are plausible in two va-ECMO-treated patient, where increasing lactate began to drop after initiation of cytokine adsorption. Taken together, these data suggest that incorporation of cytokine adsorption into the management of critically ill patients requiring continued ECMO support is feasible and easy to handle. Whether cytokine removal improves clinical outcome in ECMO-treated patients should now be investigated in randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

cardiac arrestcytokine adsorptionECMOinflammationresuscitationsepsis

Identifiers

PMID31275944
PMCPMC6593298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.