Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31275570›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2019

Understanding client and provider perspectives of antenatal care service quality: a qualitative multi-method study from Tanzania.

Ashley Sheffel, Rebecca Heidkamp, Rose Mpembeni, Peter Bujari, Jaya Gupta, Debora Niyeha, Tricia Aung, Victor Bakengesa, John Msuya, Melinda Munos and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ashley SheffelJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Rebecca HeidkampJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Rose MpembeniMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.
Peter BujariHealth Promotion Tanzania. Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.
Jaya GuptaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Debora NiyehaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Tricia AungJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Victor BakengesaMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly, and Children, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.
John MsuyaSokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania.
Melinda MunosJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Caitlin KennedyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasures of quality of care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) rarely include experience of care. This gap in service quality metrics may be driven by a lack of understanding of client and provider perspectives. Understanding these perspectives is a critical first step in not only improving metrics, but also in improving service delivery. This study identifies the items antenatal care (ANC) clients and health care providers in Tanzania associate with a quality ANC service and explores the experience of care domain from both client and provider perspectives.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with15 providers and 35 clients in Tanzania that included a free-listing activity to elicit items clients and providers associate with quality ANC services. We analyzed the free-listing for rank order and frequency to identify the most salient items, which were included in the second phase of data collection. We then conducted semi-structured interviews with a pile sort activity with the same 15 providers and 32 new clients to understand the importance of the items identified in the free-listing. We used a thematic analysis driven by the framework approach to analyze interview data.

resultsBoth clients and providers perceived quality of ANC as being comprised of items related to experience of care, provision of care, and cross-cutting essential physical and human resources. The free-listing findings illuminated that the experience of care was equally important to clients and providers as the availability of physical and human resources and the content of the care delivered. In addition, clients and providers perceived that a positive patient care experience - marked by good communication, active listening, keeping confidentiality, and being spoken to politely - increased utilization of health services and improved health outcomes.

conclusionsThe experience of care in LMICs is an overlooked, yet critically important topic. Understanding the experience of care from those who receive and deliver services is key to measuring and improving the quality of ANC. Our research highlights the importance of incorporating experience of care into future quality improvement activities and quality measures. By doing so, we identify barriers and facilitating factors of practical use to policy-makers and governments in LMICs.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthPrenatal CareQuality of Health CareAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyQualitative ResearchTanzaniaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31275570
PMCPMC6596286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.