Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31275213›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019

Family Members Dealing With Childhood Cancer: A Study on the Role of Family Functioning and Cancer Appraisal.

Marieke Van Schoors, Annick Lena De Paepe, Koenraad Norga, Veerle Cosyns, Hanne Morren, Trui Vercruysse, Liesbet Goubert, Lesley Liliane Verhofstadt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Portuguese Validation of the TAPQoL: A Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Children Aged 0-6 Years.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marieke Van SchoorsDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Annick Lena De PaepeDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Koenraad NorgaDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Veerle CosynsDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Hanne MorrenDepartment of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Trui VercruysseDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Liesbet GoubertDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Lesley Liliane VerhofstadtDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEAntwerp University Hospital · BEKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesChildhood cancer is a life-threatening disease that poses significant challenges to the life of the diagnosed child and his/her family members. Based on the ABCX-model, the aim of the current study was to explore the association between family functioning, cancer appraisal and the individual adjustment of patients, parents and siblings.

methodsParticipants were 60 children with leukemia or non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 172 parents and 78 siblings (115 families). Time since diagnosis varied from zero to 33 months. Patients, parents and siblings completed the Family Environment Scale (FES), Perceived Stress Scale, Situation-Specific Emotional Reactions Questionnaire and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory/Maudsley Marital Questionnaire.

resultsFamily functioning and the appraisal of the cancer diagnosis proved to be related to patients', parents' and siblings' cancer-related emotions and quality of life post-diagnosis. In addition, family members differed in their perception of some family functioning domains, the appraisal of the cancer diagnosis, positive feelings and quality of life. DISCUSSION: Our findings led to the conclusion that family functioning and the appraisal of the cancer diagnosis are important for the individual adjustment of patients, parents and siblings when facing a diagnosis of cancer in the child. Differences across members within one family and differences between families speak to the need of screening all family members and intervening at the level of individual as well as the family unit.

Indexed as

cancer appraisalfamiliesfamily functioningindividual adjustmentpediatric cancer

Identifiers

PMID31275213
PMCPMC6594216
OpenAlexW2949742168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.