Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31275191›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019

New Technologies for the Understanding, Assessment, and Intervention of Emotion Regulation.

Desirée Colombo, Javier Fernández-Álvarez, Azucena García Palacios, Pietro Cipresso, Cristina Botella, Giuseppe Riva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Desirée ColomboDepartment of Basic Psychology, Clinical and Psychobiology, Jaume I University, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.
Javier Fernández-ÁlvarezDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Azucena García PalaciosDepartment of Basic Psychology, Clinical and Psychobiology, Jaume I University, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.
Pietro CipressoDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Cristina BotellaDepartment of Basic Psychology, Clinical and Psychobiology, Jaume I University, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.
Giuseppe RivaDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decades, emotion regulation (ER) received increasing attention and became one of the most studied topics within the psychological field. Nevertheless, this construct has not been fully updated with the latest technological advancements. In this perspective, we will show how diverse technologies, such as virtual reality (VR), wearable biosensors, smartphones, or biofeedback techniques, can be applied to the understanding, assessment, and intervention of ER. After providing a brief overview of the currently available technological developments, we will discuss the benefits of incorporating new technologies in ER field, including ecological validity, intervention personalization, and the integration of understudied facets of ER, such as the implicit and interpersonal dimension.

Indexed as

biofeedbackemotion regulationinternet interventionsserious gamessmartphonesvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID31275191
PMCPMC6591314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.