Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31275176›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2019

Introducing Machine Learning to Detect Personality Faking-Good in a Male Sample: A New Model Based on Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form Scales and Reaction Times.

Cristina Mazza, Merylin Monaro, Graziella Orrù, Franco Burla, Marco Colasanti, Stefano Ferracuti, Paolo Roma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Facial Emotion Recognition Predicts Alexithymia Using Machine Learning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. MMPI-2-RF Profiles in Child Custody Litigants.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina MazzaDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Merylin MonaroDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Graziella OrrùDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular & Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Franco BurlaDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Marco ColasantiDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Stefano FerracutiDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Paolo RomaDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

faking-goodmachine learningMinnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Formresponse latencytime pressure

Identifiers

PMID31275176
PMCPMC6593269
OpenAlexW2973997433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.