Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31275156›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2019

Brain and Pituitary Response to Vaccination in Gilthead Seabream (

X H Liu, A R Khansari, M Teles, G Martínez-Rodríguez, Y G Zhang, J M Mancera, F E Reyes-López, L Tort

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

X H LiuDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
A R KhansariDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
M TelesDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
G Martínez-RodríguezInstituto de Ciencias Marinas de Andalucia, Cádiz, Spain.
Y G ZhangKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development (Ministry of Education), Key Laboratory of Aquatic Science of Chongqing, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
J M ManceraDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Instituto Universitario de Investigación Marina (INMAR), Campus de Excelencia Internacional del Mar (CEI-MAR), University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
F E Reyes-LópezDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
L TortDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESSouthwest University · CNInstituto de Ciencias Marinas de Andalucía · ESUniversidad de Cádiz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is a widely used therapeutical strategy in aquaculture, but whether vaccination elicits stress responses in the central neuroendocrine system and enhances the crosstalk between the immune and endocrine systems in the brain or pituitary after vaccination is unclear. To answer this question two experiments using two different vaccine exposure routes, i.e., bath or intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection, were carried out on gilthead seabream (

Indexed as

brainimmune responsepituitarystress responsevaccination

Identifiers

PMID31275156
PMCPMC6591443
OpenAlexW2952153542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.