Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31275138›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2019

The Gut-Brain Axis in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Relevance of the Canine Model: A Review.

Yoko M Ambrosini, Dana Borcherding, Anumantha Kanthasamy, Hyun Jung Kim, Auriel A Willette, Albert Jergens, Karin Allenspach, Jonathan P Mochel

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoko M AmbrosiniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Dana BorcherdingDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Anumantha KanthasamyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Hyun Jung KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Auriel A WilletteDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Albert JergensDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Karin AllenspachDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Jonathan P MochelDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Iowa State University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Insulin Resistance, Biomarkers of Brain Function, and Intermittent Calorie RestrictionR00AG047282 · NIA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLETTE, AURIEL · 2016 to 2021
$730k
NIA NIH HHS R00 AG047282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying appropriate animal models is critical in developing translatable

Indexed as

animal modelscaninegut-brain axisneurodegenerative diseasereviewtranslational

Identifiers

PMID31275138
PMCPMC6591269
OpenAlexW2949125436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.