Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31274879›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement2018

Graphene Devices for Tabletop and High-Current Quantized Hall Resistance Standards.

Albert F Rigosi, Alireza R Panna, Shamith U Payagala, Mattias Kruskopf, Marlin E Kraft, George R Jones, Bi-Yi Wu, Hsin-Yen Lee, Yanfei Yang, Jiuning Hu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Metrological Suitability of Functionalized Epitaxial Graphene.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2020
    Article
  9. Analysing quantized resistance behaviour in graphene CorbinoJournal of physics D: Applied physics · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparison between Graphene and GaAs Quantized Hall Devices with a Dual Probe.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparison between NIST Graphene and AIST GaAs Quantized Hall Devices.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2019
    Article
  14. The Quantum Hall Effect in the Era of the New SI.Semiconductor science and technology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Albert F Rigosi *Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8189-3829
Alireza R Panna *Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.
Shamith U Payagala *Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.
Mattias KruskopfJoint Quantum Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA.
Marlin E KraftPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.
George R JonesPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.
Bi-Yi WuGraduate Institute of Applied Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Hsin-Yen LeeTheiss Research, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA.
Yanfei YangJoint Quantum Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA.
Jiuning HuJoint Quantum Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA.
Dean G JarrettPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.
David B NewellPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.
Randolph E ElmquistPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the performance of a quantum Hall resistance standard based on epitaxial graphene maintained in a 5-T tabletop cryocooler system. This quantum resistance standard requires no liquid helium and can operate continuously, allowing year-round accessibility to quantized Hall resistance measurements. The

Indexed as

Binary cryogenic current comparator (BCCC)direct current comparator (DCC)epitaxial graphene (EG)metrologyquantized Hall resistance (QHR)standard resistorstandards and calibration

Identifiers

PMID31274879
PMCPMC6604640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.