Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31274832›Full record

ReviewThe Pediatric infectious disease journal2019

Revisiting Bacterial Interference in the Age of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Insights Into Staphylococcus aureus Carriage, Pathogenicity and Potential Control.

Paul J Planet, Dane Parker, Naomi L Ruff, Henry R Shinefield

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Computational and in vitro evaluation of probiotic treatments for nasalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Critical Assessment of the Prospects of Quorum-Quenching Therapy forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul J PlanetFrom the Department of Pediatrics University of Pennsylvania & Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Dane ParkerDepartment of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Immunity and Inflammation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
Naomi L RuffRuffDraft Communications LLC Duluth, Minnesota.
Henry R ShinefieldDepartment of Pediatrics, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, California (emeritus).

Funding

ROLE OF TYPE III INTERFERONS IN STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONR01HL134870 · NHLBI · RBHS-NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PARKER, DANE · 2017 to 2020
$1.8M
Bacterial Interference to Prevent Staphylococcus aureus InfectionR01AI137526 · NIAID · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI PLANET, PAUL J · 2018 to 2021
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL134870NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI137526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria compete with each other for local supremacy in biologic and environmental niches. In humans, who host an array of commensal bacteria, the presence of one species or strain can sometimes prevent colonization by another, a phenomenon known as "bacterial interference." We describe how, in the 1960s, infants (and later adults) were actively inoculated with a relatively benign strain of Staphylococcus aureus, 502A, to prevent colonization with an epidemic S. aureus strain, 80/81. This introduced bacterial interference as a clinical approach to disease prevention, but little was known about the mechanisms of interference at that time. Since then, much has been learned about how bacteria interact with each other and the host to establish carriage, compete for niches and shift from harmless commensal to invasive pathogen. We provide an overview of these findings and summarize recent studies in which the genome and function of 502A were compared with those of the current epidemic strain, USA300, providing insight into differences in their invasiveness and immunogenicity. Although staphylococcal vaccines have been developed, none has yet been approved for clinical use. Further studies of staphylococcal strains and the molecular characteristics that lead to exclusion of specific bacteria from some niches may provide an alternative path to disease prevention.

Indexed as

AntibiosisAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarrier StateEpidemicsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMethicillinMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiceStaphylococcal InfectionsSymbiosisVirulenceVirulence FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsMethicillinVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID31274832
PMCPMC6692185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.