ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2020
Beneficial Effects of Ivabradine on Post-Resuscitation Myocardial Dysfunction in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest.
Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of ivabradine in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: exploring of underlying argument.Inflammopharmacology · 2022Article
- UAMC-3203 or/and Deferoxamine Improve Post-Resuscitation Myocardial Dysfunction Through Suppressing Ferroptosis in a Rat Model of Cardiac Arrest.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2022Article
- Inhibition of TGFβ-activated protein kinase 1 ameliorates myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury via endoplasmic reticulum stress suppression.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIvabradine selectively inhibits the If current, reducing the heart rate and protecting against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. We investigated the effects of ivabradine on post-resuscitation myocardial function in a porcine model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS AND
resultsVentricular fibrillation was induced and untreated for 8 min while defibrillation was attempted after 6 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in anesthetized domestic swine. Then the animals were randomized into ivabradine and placebo groups (n = 5 each). Ivabradine and saline were administered at the same volume 5 min after Return of Spontaneous Circulation, followed by continuous intravenous infusion at 0.5 mg/kg for 480 min. Hemodynamic parameters were continuously recorded. Myocardial function was assessed by echocardiography at baseline and at 60, 120, 240, 480 min and 24 h after resuscitation. The serum levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) were measured by commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Animals were killed 24 h after resuscitation, and all myocardial tissue was removed for histopathological analysis. The heart rate was significantly reduced from 1 h after resuscitation in the ivabradine group (all P < 0.05). The post-resuscitation mitral E/A and E/e' velocity ratios and left ventricular ejection fraction were significantly better in the ivabradine than placebo group (P < 0.05). The serum levels of myocardial injury biomarkers (NT-proBNP, cTnI) and the myocardial biopsy scores were significantly lower in the ivabradine than placebo group (P < 0.05). Neurological deficit scores were lower in the IVA group at PR 24 h (P < 0.05).
conclusionsIvabradine improved post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction, myocardial injury, and post-resuscitation cerebral function, and also slowed the heart rate in this porcine model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.