Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31274719›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume2019

Step Activity After Surgical Treatment of Ankle Arthritis.

Jane B Shofer, William R Ledoux, Michael S Orendurff, Sigvard T Hansen, James Davitt, John G Anderson, Donald Bohay, J Chris Coetzee, Michael Houghton, Daniel C Norvell and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Methodology for Measurement ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jane B ShoferRR&D Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
William R LedouxRR&D Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Michael S OrendurffRR&D Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Sigvard T HansenDepartments of Mechanical Engineering (W.R.L.) and Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine (W.R.L., S.T.H., and B.J.S.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
James DavittOrthopedic + Fracture Specialists, Portland, Oregon.
John G AndersonOrthopaedic Associates of Michigan, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Donald BohayOrthopaedic Associates of Michigan, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
J Chris CoetzeeTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota.
Michael HoughtonOrthopaedic & Spine Center of the Rockies, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Daniel C NorvellSpectrum Research, Tacoma, Washington.
Bruce J SangeorzanRR&D Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

Senior Research Career ScientistIK6RX002970 · VA · VA PUGET SOUND HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI LEDOUX, WILLIAM R. · 2018 to 2025
–
RRD VA IK6 RX002970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmbulatory activity is reduced in patients with ankle arthritis. In this study, we measured step activity over time in 2 treatment groups and secondarily compared step activity with results of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

methodsPatients who were treated with either ankle arthrodesis or ankle arthroplasty wore a step activity monitor preoperatively and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. Changes from preoperative baseline in total steps per day and per-day metrics of low, medium, and high-activity step counts were measured in both treatment groups. Step activity was compared with each subject's PROM scores as reported on the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical function and bodily pain subscales.

resultsOf the 3 activity levels, combined group high-activity step counts showed the greatest increase (mean of 278 steps [95% confidence interval (CI), 150 to 407 steps], a 46% improvement from preoperatively). At 6 months, the mean high-activity step improvement for the arthroplasty group was 194 steps compared with a mean decline of 44 steps for the arthrodesis group (mean 238-step difference [95% CI, -60 to 536 steps]). By 36 months postoperatively, the greater improvement in high-activity steps for the arthroplasty versus the arthrodesis group was no longer present. There were no significant pairwise differences in improvement based on surgical treatment method at any individual follow-up time point. For a within-patient increase of 1,000 total steps, there was a mean change in the MFA, SF-36 physical function, and SF-36 bodily pain scores of -1.8 (95% CI, -2.4 to -1.2), 3.8 (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.8), and 2.8 (95% CI, 1.8 to 3.9), respectively (p < 0.0001 for all associations). There was no evidence that the association differed by study visit, or by study visit and surgical procedure interaction (p > 0.10).

conclusionsSurgical treatment of ankle arthritis significantly improves ambulatory activity, with greater change occurring at high activity levels. Improvement may occur more quickly following arthroplasty than arthrodesis, but at 3 years, we detected no significant difference between the 2 procedures. Step counts, while associated with PROMs, do not parallel them, and thus may be a useful supplementary measure, particularly in longitudinal studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Indexed as

WalkingAnkle JointArthrodesisArthroplasty, Replacement, AnkleDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, AmbulatoryOsteoarthritisPain MeasurementPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31274719
PMCPMC11883842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.