Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31274600›Full record

Observational studyAnesthesia and analgesia2020

Epidural Analgesia During Childbirth and Postpartum Depressive Symptoms: A Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Patricia Eckerdal, Natasa Kollia, Linnea Karlsson, Agneta Skoog-Svanberg, Anna-Karin Wikström, Ulf Högberg, Alkistis Skalkidou

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Predictors of Postpartum Depression among Italian Women: A Longitudinal Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Perinatal depression.International anesthesiology clinics · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Patricia EckerdalFrom the Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Natasa KolliaDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Linnea KarlssonDepartment of Child Psychiatry, FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, Turku Brain and Mind Centre, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Agneta Skoog-SvanbergFrom the Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna-Karin WikströmFrom the Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ulf HögbergFrom the Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Alkistis SkalkidouFrom the Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEHarokopio University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere pain has been linked to depression, which raises the question of whether epidural analgesia (EDA) during childbirth is associated with a reduced risk of postpartum depression (PPD). This association has been explored previously, but the studies were restricted by small sample sizes and the inability to control for relevant confounders. This study aimed to investigate the association between the administration of EDA and the development of PPD after adjusting for sociodemographic, psychosocial, and obstetric variables.

methodsData were retrieved from the Biology, Affect, Stress, Imaging and Cognition (BASIC) project (2009-2017), a population-based longitudinal cohort study of pregnant women conducted at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden. The outcome was PPD at 6 weeks postpartum, defined as a score of ≥12 points on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Information was collected through medical records and self-reported web-based questionnaires during pregnancy and 6 weeks after childbirth. Only primiparous women with spontaneous start of childbirth were included (n = 1503). The association between EDA and PPD was examined in multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic, psychosocial, and obstetric variables. Results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsOf the 1503 women included in the analysis, 800 (53%) reported use of EDA during childbirth. PPD at 6 weeks postpartum was present in 193 (13%) women. EDA was not associated with higher odds of PPD at 6 weeks postpartum after adjusting for suspected confounders (age, fear of childbirth, antenatal depressive symptoms; adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.87-1.72).

conclusionsEDA was not associated with the risk of PPD at 6 weeks postpartum after adjusting for sociodemographic, psychosocial, and obstetric variables. However, these findings do not preclude a potential association between PPD and childbirth pain or other aspects of EDA that were not assessed in this study.

Indexed as

AffectAnalgesia, EpiduralParturitionAdultDepression, PostpartumFearFemaleHumansLabor PainLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyRisk FactorsSwedenTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31274600
OpenAlexW2961162774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.