ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2019
Focus characterization of the NanoMAX Kirkpatrick-Baez mirror system.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning of structural morphology imaged by scanning X-ray diffraction microscopy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Design and performance of a dedicated coherent X-ray scanning diffraction instrument at beamline NanoMAX of MAX IV.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2022Article
- X-ray in-line holography and holotomography at the NanoMAX beamline.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2022Article
- NanoMAX: the hard X-ray nanoprobe beamline at the MAX IV Laboratory.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2021Article
- First ptychographic X-ray computed tomography experiment on the NanoMAX beamline.Journal of applied crystallography · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The focusing and coherence properties of the NanoMAX Kirkpatrick-Baez mirror system at the fourth-generation MAX IV synchrotron in Lund have been characterized. The direct measurement of nano-focused X-ray beams is possible by scanning of an X-ray waveguide, serving basically as an ultra-thin slit. In quasi-coherent operation, beam sizes of down to 56 nm (FWHM, horizontal direction) can be achieved. Comparing measured Airy-like fringe patterns with simulations, the degree of coherence |μ| has been quantified as a function of the secondary source aperture (SSA); the coherence is larger than 50% for SSA sizes below 11 µm at hard X-ray energies of 14 keV. For an SSA size of 5 µm, the degree of coherence has been determined to be 87%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.