Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31274245›Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2019

Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials.

Grace Egan, Paula D Robinson, Juan P D Martinez, Sarah Alexander, Roland A Ammann, L Lee Dupuis, Brian T Fisher, Thomas Lehrnbecher, Bob Phillips, Sandra Cabral and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Emerging challenges in the evaluation of fever in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia in the era of COVID-19: a MASCC position paper.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Guideline
  5. Guideline for Antibacterial Prophylaxis Administration in Pediatric Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antibacterial prophylaxis for neutropenic and high-risk hematology patients-Do the benefits outweigh the risk?Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Grace EganDivision of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paula D RobinsonPediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Juan P D MartinezBiostatistics Research Unit, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah AlexanderDivision of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Roland A AmmannDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
L Lee DupuisDepartment of Pharmacy and Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Brian T FisherDivision of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thomas LehrnbecherPediatric Hematology and Oncology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Bob PhillipsLeeds Children's Hospital, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Leeds West Yorkshire, UK.
Sandra CabralPediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
George TomlinsonBiostatistics Research Unit, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lillian SungDivision of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0951-3091
University of Toronto · CAHospital for Sick Children · CAPediatric Oncology Group · CAChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DELeeds General Infirmary · GBToronto General Hospital · CAUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the efficacy and safety of different prophylactic systemic antibiotics in adult and pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and performed searches of Ovid MEDLINE, MEDLINE in-process and Embase; and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies were included if patients had cancer or were HSCT recipients with anticipated neutropenia, and the intervention was systemic antibacterial prophylaxis. Strategies synthesized included fluoroquinolone vs no antibiotic/nonabsorbable antibiotic; fluoroquinolone vs trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole vs no antibiotic; and cephalosporin vs. no antibiotic. Fluoroquinolone vs cephalosporin and levofloxacin vs ciprofloxacin were compared by network meta-analysis. Primary outcome was bacteremia.

resultsOf 20 984 citations screened, 113 studies comparing prophylactic antibiotic to control were included. The following were effective in reducing bacteremia: fluoroquinolone vs no antibiotic/nonabsorbable antibiotic (risk ratio (RR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.76), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole vs no antibiotic (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.85) and cephalosporin vs no antibiotic (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16-0.58). Fluoroquinolone was not significantly associated with increased Clostridium difficile infection (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.31-1.24) or invasive fungal disease (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.79-2.08) but did increase resistance to fluoroquinolone among bacteremia isolates (RR 3.35, 95% CI 1.12 to 10.03). Heterogeneity in fluoroquinolone effect on bacteremia was not explained by evaluated study, population, or methodological factors. Network meta-analysis revealed no direct comparisons for pre-specified analyses; superior regimens were not identified.

conclusionsFluoroquinolone, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and cephalosporin prophylaxis reduced bacteremia. A clinical practice guideline to facilitate prophylactic antibiotic decision-making is required.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAntineoplastic AgentsBacteremiaHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationNeoplasmsAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntineoplastic Agentsantibiotic prophylaxiscancermeta-analysisrandomized trials

Identifiers

PMID31274245
PMCPMC6712447
OpenAlexW2955700123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.